131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37750346)
1. Evaluating equity of access and predictors of minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancer from 2000 to 2017 in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cohort study.
McGinnis JM; Pond GR; Reade CJ; Schnarr KL; Simunovic M; Elit LM; Seow HY; Helpman L
J Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 129(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 37750346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rates over time and regional variation of radical minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: A population based study.
Willows K; Kupets R; Diong C; Vicus D; Covens A; Gien LT
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):338-344. PubMed ID: 31171407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period.
Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Chang EJ; Klar M; Matsushima K; Grubbs BH; Roman LD; Wright JD
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32473728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regional trends of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and exploration of perioperative outcomes.
Holtzman S; Chaoul J; Finkelstein M; Kolev V; Zakashansky K
Cancer Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 77():102095. PubMed ID: 35078009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.
Kim SI; Kim TH; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon HW; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Yonsei Med J; 2021 Mar; 62(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 33635013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Smith AJB; Jones TN; Miao D; Fader AN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):544-555.e7. PubMed ID: 33359291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Melamed A; Margul DJ; Chen L; Keating NL; Del Carmen MG; Yang J; Seagle BL; Alexander A; Barber EL; Rice LW; Wright JD; Kocherginsky M; Shahabi S; Rauh-Hain JA
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1905-1914. PubMed ID: 30379613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach.
Dos Reis R; Andrade CEMC; Frumovitz M; Munsell M; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1224-1230. PubMed ID: 29530834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disparities in surgical management of endometrial cancers in a public healthcare system: A question of equity.
Helpman L; Pond GR; Elit L; Anderson LN; Seow H
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 159(2):387-393. PubMed ID: 32928520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study.
Jensen PT; Schnack TH; Frøding LP; Bjørn SF; Lajer H; Markauskas A; Jochumsen KM; Fuglsang K; Dinesen J; Søgaard CH; Søgaard-Andersen E; Jensen MM; Knudsen A; Øster LH; Høgdall C
Eur J Cancer; 2020 Mar; 128():47-56. PubMed ID: 32109850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of the surgical approach on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A real-world multicenter study of a large Chinese cohort from 2006 to 2017.
Guo C; Tang X; Meng Y; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Guo J; Lei X; Qiu J; Hua K
Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(16):5908-5921. PubMed ID: 32628356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimal-invasive or open approach for surgery of early cervical cancer: the treatment center matters.
Gennari P; Gerken M; Mészáros J; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Ortmann O; Eggemann H; Ignatov A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Aug; 304(2):503-510. PubMed ID: 33483846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan.
Ohta T; Nagase S; Okui Y; Enomoto T; Yamagami W; Mikami M; Tokunaga H; Ino K; Ushijima K; Shozu M; Tashiro H; Mandai M; Miyamoto S; Morishige KI; Yoshida Y; Yoshino K; Saito T; Kobayashi E; Kobayashi H; Takekuma M; Terai Y; Fujii T; Kanao H; Aoki D; Katabuchi H; Yaegashi N
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Dec; 26(12):2318-2330. PubMed ID: 34435284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
