These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37750633)
1. Direct and indirect bonding techniques in orthodontics: a systematic review. Patano A; Inchingolo AD; Malcangi G; Garibaldi M; De Leonardis N; Campanelli M; Palumbo I; Benagiano S; Bordea IR; Minetti E; Palermo A; Inchingolo F; Dipalma G; Inchingolo AM Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Sep; 27(17):8039-8054. PubMed ID: 37750633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Li Y; Mei L; Wei J; Yan X; Zhang X; Zheng W; Li Y BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):137. PubMed ID: 31286897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket positioning between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques in the maxillary arch: a three-dimensional study. Aboujaoude R; Kmeid R; Gebrael C; Amm E Prog Orthod; 2022 Sep; 23(1):31. PubMed ID: 36058991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orthodontic bracket bonding techniques and adhesion failures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dos Santos AL; Wambier LM; Wambier DS; Moreira KM; Imparato JC; Chibinski AC J Clin Exp Dent; 2022 Sep; 14(9):e746-e755. PubMed ID: 36158772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided indirect bonding versus traditional direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: bonding time, immediate bonding failures, and cost-minimization. A randomized controlled trial. Czolgosz I; Cattaneo PM; Cornelis MA Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr; 43(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 32780096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study on direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques regarding time length and bracket detachment. Bozelli JV; Bigliazzi R; Barbosa HA; Ortolani CL; Bertoz FA; Faltin Junior K Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):51-7. PubMed ID: 24351150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of bracket positioning in the indirect bonding technique. Nichols DA; Gardner G; Carballeyra AD Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):770-6. PubMed ID: 24182593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniques. Koo BC; Chung CH; Vanarsdall RL Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):346-51. PubMed ID: 10474109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital assessment of direct and virtual indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets: A clinical prospective cross-sectional comparative investigation. Panayi NC; Tsolakis AI; Athanasiou AE Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):714-721. PubMed ID: 33129700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Novel Technique for Accuracy in Horizontal, Vertical, and Axial Bracket Placement in Orthodontic Bonding. Banker A; Vala V; Desai BB J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1076-1078. PubMed ID: 35000956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indirect laminate veneers as an indirect bonding method. Miyazawa K; Miwa H; Goto S; Kondo T World J Orthod; 2004; 5(4):308-11. PubMed ID: 15633376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques. Aguirre MJ; King GJ; Waldron JM Am J Orthod; 1982 Oct; 82(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 6760721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Direct versus Indirect Bonding Technique on the Failure Rate of Mandibular Fixed Retainer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ahmed A; Fida M; Habib S; Javed F; Ali US Int Orthod; 2021 Dec; 19(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 34629308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sabbagh H; Khazaei Y; Baumert U; Hoffmann L; Wichelhaus A; Janjic Rankovic M J Clin Med; 2022 May; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 35566695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of self-etch primers with conventional acid-etch technique for bonding brackets in orthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kerayechian N; Bardideh E; Bayani S Eur J Orthod; 2022 Aug; 44(4):385-395. PubMed ID: 35022707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Construction of an Goyal S; Kulkarni N; Naik A; Naik B J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Feb; 23(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 35748449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of bracket position using thermoplastic and 3D-printed indirect bonding trays. Shin SH; Lee KJ; Kim SJ; Yu HS; Kim KM; Hwang CJ; Cha JY Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 34085499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. Sinha PK; Nanda RS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives. Zachrisson BU; Brobakken BO Am J Orthod; 1978 Jul; 74(1):62-78. PubMed ID: 356618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]