These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37750743)

  • 1. This Is Your Brain on Autopilot 2.0: The Influence of Practice on Driver Workload and Engagement During On-Road, Partially Automated Driving.
    McDonnell AS; Crabtree KW; Cooper JM; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; 66(8):2025-2040. PubMed ID: 37750743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. This Is Your Brain on Autopilot: Neural Indices of Driver Workload and Engagement During Partial Vehicle Automation.
    McDonnell AS; Simmons TG; Erickson GG; Lohani M; Cooper JM; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1435-1450. PubMed ID: 34414813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the impact of on-road partially-automated driving on drivers' cognitive workload and attention allocation.
    Biondi FN; Jajo N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jun; 200():107537. PubMed ID: 38471237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Partial Automation on Driver Attention: A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Gaspar J; Carney C
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 30920852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Hazard Detection Failures Are a Matter of Time.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29513611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gaze entropy metrics for mental workload estimation are heterogenous during hands-off level 2 automation.
    Goodridge CM; Gonçalves RC; Arabian A; Horrobin A; Solernou A; Lee YT; Lee YM; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107560. PubMed ID: 38677239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driver Vigilance Decrement is More Severe During Automated Driving than Manual Driving.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):574-588. PubMed ID: 35624552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No Difference in Arousal or Cognitive Demands Between Manual and Partially Automated Driving: A Multi-Method On-Road Study.
    Lohani M; Cooper JM; Erickson GG; Simmons TG; McDonnell AS; Carriero AE; Crabtree KW; Strayer DL
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():577418. PubMed ID: 34177439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transition to manual: Comparing simulator with on-road control transitions.
    Eriksson A; Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():227-234. PubMed ID: 28342410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How we can measure the non-driving-task engagement in automated driving: Comparing flow experience and workload.
    Ko SM; Ji YG
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():237-245. PubMed ID: 29122195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.
    Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Promote or inhibit: An inverted U-shaped effect of workload on driver takeover performance.
    Ma S; Zhang W; Yang Z; Kang C; Wu C; Chai C; Shi J; Li H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(7):482-487. PubMed ID: 32822218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state.
    Merat N; Jamson AH; Lai FC; Carsten O
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):762-71. PubMed ID: 23156621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Boring But Demanding: Using Secondary Tasks to Counter the Driver Vigilance Decrement for Partially Automated Driving.
    Mishler S; Chen J
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jun; 66(6):1798-1811. PubMed ID: 37187161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.
    Shahini F; Park J; Welch K; Zahabi M
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):182-197. PubMed ID: 35451915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation.
    Clark H; Feng J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():468-479. PubMed ID: 27686942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of task combination on EEG spectrum modulation for driver workload estimation.
    Lei S; Roetting M
    Hum Factors; 2011 Apr; 53(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 21702334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Effects of Demands on Hazard Detection Performance.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):474-487. PubMed ID: 30307760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What's skill got to do with it? Vehicle automation and driver mental workload.
    Young MS; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1324-39. PubMed ID: 17558672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.