These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37750743)

  • 21. Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control.
    Eriksson A; Stanton NA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):689-705. PubMed ID: 28124573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Driver behavior and mental workload for takeover safety in automated driving: ACT-R prediction modeling approach.
    Oh H; Yun Y; Myung R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):381-389. PubMed ID: 38252064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Driver distraction and its effects on partially automated driving performance: A driving simulator study among young-experienced drivers.
    Zangi N; Srour-Zreik R; Ridel D; Chasidim H; Borowsky A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106565. PubMed ID: 35032704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations: The Role of Traffic Density.
    Gold C; Körber M; Lechner D; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 26984515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential.
    Louw T; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 23(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 27655754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal.
    Miller EE; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):152-164. PubMed ID: 30235014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.
    Nordhoff S; Stapel J; He X; Gentner A; Happee R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260953. PubMed ID: 34932565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of cognitive load on drivers' State and task performance during automated driving: Introducing a novel method for determining stabilisation time following take-over of control.
    Melnicuk V; Thompson S; Jennings P; Birrell S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105967. PubMed ID: 33444868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exploring the effectiveness of a digital voice assistant to maintain driver alertness in partially automated vehicles.
    Mahajan K; Large DR; Burnett G; Velaga NR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(5):378-383. PubMed ID: 33881365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
    Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():202-209. PubMed ID: 30665055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of levels of automation and non-driving related tasks on driver performance and workload: A review of literature and meta-analysis.
    Shahini F; Zahabi M
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Oct; 104():103824. PubMed ID: 35724471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Effects of Vehicle Automation on Driver Engagement: The Case of Adaptive Cruise Control and Mind Wandering.
    Weaver SM; Roldan SM; Gonzalez TB; Balk SA; Philips BH
    Hum Factors; 2022 Sep; 64(6):1086-1098. PubMed ID: 33296230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Driver behavior and the use of automation in real-world driving.
    Gershon P; Seaman S; Mehler B; Reimer B; Coughlin J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Aug; 158():106217. PubMed ID: 34087506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Hasegawa K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():231-238. PubMed ID: 32199568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.