These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3775079)
1. Comparison of measured and calculated absorbed doses from tangential irradiation of the breast. Knöös T; Ahlgren L; Nilsson M Radiother Oncol; 1986 Sep; 7(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 3775079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tangential breast irradiation: a multi-centric intercomparison of dose using a mailed phantom and thermoluminescent dosimetry. Davis JB; Miltchev V Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jul; 52(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 10577688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Verification of tangential breast treatment dose calculations in a commercial 3D treatment planning system. Baird CT; Starkschall G; Liu HH; Buchholz TA; Hogstrom KR J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2001; 2(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 11604052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scatter dose from tangential breast irradiation to the uninvolved breast. Muller-Runkel R; Kalokhe UP Radiology; 1990 Jun; 175(3):873-6. PubMed ID: 2343139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional dose distribution of tangential breast irradiation: results of a multicentre phantom dosimetry study. Delaney G; Beckham W; Veness M; Ahern V; Back M; Boyages J; Fox C; Graham P; Jacob G; Lonergan D; Morgan G; Pendlebury S; Yuile P Radiother Oncol; 2000 Oct; 57(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 11033190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience. Kestin LL; Sharpe MB; Frazier RC; Vicini FA; Yan D; Matter RC; Martinez AA; Wong JW Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1559-68. PubMed ID: 11121662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can radiation therapy treatment planning system accurately predict surface doses in postmastectomy radiation therapy patients? Wong S; Back M; Tan PW; Lee KM; Baggarley S; Lu JJ Med Dosim; 2012; 37(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 21865026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetry of MammoSite® applicator: comparison between Monte Carlo simulation, measurements, and treatment planning calculation. Oshaghi M; Sadeghi M; Mahdavi SR; Shirazi A J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 23771363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries. Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calculation of organ doses from breast cancer radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study. Berris T; Mazonakis M; Stratakis J; Tzedakis A; Fasoulaki A; Damilakis J J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):4029. PubMed ID: 23318389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phantom study of radiation doses outside the target volume brachytherapy versus external radiotherapy of early breast cancer. Johansson B; Persson E; Westman G; Persliden J Radiother Oncol; 2003 Oct; 69(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 14597363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of superficial dosimetry between treatment planning system and measurement for several breast cancer treatment techniques. Akino Y; Das IJ; Bartlett GK; Zhang H; Thompson E; Zook JE Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011714. PubMed ID: 23298084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetry around metallic ports in tissue expanders in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy: an ex vivo evaluation. Moni J; Graves-Ditman M; Cederna P; Griffith K; Krueger EA; Fraass BA; Pierce LJ Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15023393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of treatment planning systems in irradiation of breast with tangential fields. Cheng CW; Das IJ; Tang W; Chang S; Tsai JS; Ceberg C; De Gaspie B; Singh R; Fein DA; Fowble B Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jul; 38(4):835-42. PubMed ID: 9240653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation for breast cancer. Li JS; Freedman GM; Price R; Wang L; Anderson P; Chen L; Xiong W; Yang J; Pollack A; Ma CM Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1023-31. PubMed ID: 15191288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface dose measurement and comparison between TLD and OSLD during modified re constructive mastectomy irradiation. K E R; Krishnan M Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38714180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose to the contralateral breast: a comparison of two techniques using the enhanced dynamic wedge versus a standard wedge. Warlick WB; O'Rear JH; Earley L; Moeller JH; Gaffney DK; Leavitt DD Med Dosim; 1997; 22(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 9307948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose to the contralateral breast due to primary breast irradiation. Fraass BA; Roberson PL; Lichter AS Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1985 Mar; 11(3):485-97. PubMed ID: 3972661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of measured and calculated dose distributions in lung after electron beam treatment of the chest wall. Seuntjens J; Van der Plaetsen A; Thierens H; Piessens M Med Phys; 1994 Dec; 21(12):1959-68. PubMed ID: 7700204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]