149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37750848)
41. Use of
Mogensen AW; Petersen LJ; Torp-Pedersen C; Nørgaard M; Pank MT; Zacho HD
BMJ Open; 2022 Jun; 12(6):e058898. PubMed ID: 35705343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Technical feasibility, radiation dosimetry and clinical use of
Usmani S; Van den Wyngaert T; Ahmed N; Marafi F; Esmail A; Al Kandari F; Al Nuaimi M; Gnanasegaran G
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 32(9):594-601. PubMed ID: 30019285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. 18F-Fluoride positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Even-Sapir E; Mishani E; Flusser G; Metser U
Semin Nucl Med; 2007 Nov; 37(6):462-9. PubMed ID: 17920353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Observer agreement and accuracy of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/computed tomography in the diagnosis of skull-base bone invasion and osseous metastases in newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Xiao J; Wang D; Guo B; Wang L; Su M; Xu H
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Sep; 41(9):942-949. PubMed ID: 32796483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prospective Comparison of PET Imaging with PSMA-Targeted
Rowe SP; Li X; Trock BJ; Werner RA; Frey S; DiGianvittorio M; Bleiler JK; Reyes DK; Abdallah R; Pienta KJ; Gorin MA; Pomper MG
J Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 61(2):183-188. PubMed ID: 31451492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Diagnostic bone imaging in patients with prostate cancer: patient experience and acceptance of NaF-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, whole-body MRI, and bone SPECT/CT.
Dyrberg E; Larsen EL; Hendel HW; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1119-1125. PubMed ID: 29313360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A proof-of-concept study analyzing the clinical utility of fluorine-18-sodium fluoride PET-CT in skeletal staging of oncology patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis.
Usmani S; Marafi F; Esmail A; Ahmed N
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 28953207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Bone metastases in prostate cancer - Gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen or Fluorine 18 sodium fluoride PET/computed tomography - the better tracer?
Agrawal A; Natarajan A; Mithun S; Bakshi G; Joshi A; Murthy V; Menon S; Purandare N; Shah S; Puranik A; Choudhury S; Prakash G; Pal M; Maitre P; Prabhash K; Noronha V; Rangarajan V
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Dec; 43(12):1225-1232. PubMed ID: 36345767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI compared with (18)F-NaF PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate carcinoma.
Mosavi F; Johansson S; Sandberg DT; Turesson I; Sörensen J; Ahlström H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1114-20. PubMed ID: 23096187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Clinical significance of extraskeletal computed tomography findings on 18F-NaF PET/CT performed for osseous metastatic disease evaluation.
Guo HH; Moradi F; Iagaru A
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Sep; 37(9):975-82. PubMed ID: 27111100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Spine metastases in prostate cancer: comparison of technetium-99m-MDP whole-body bone scintigraphy, [(18) F]choline positron emission tomography(PET)/computed tomography (CT) and [(18) F]NaF PET/CT.
Poulsen MH; Petersen H; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Jakobsen JS; Gerke O; Karstoft J; Steffansen SI; Walter S
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 24314065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Multi-technique imaging of bone metastases: spotlight on PET-CT.
Azad GK; Cook GJ
Clin Radiol; 2016 Jul; 71(7):620-31. PubMed ID: 26997430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study.
Beheshti M; Vali R; Waldenberger P; Fitz F; Nader M; Loidl W; Broinger G; Stoiber F; Foglman I; Langsteger W
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Oct; 35(10):1766-74. PubMed ID: 18465129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Bone metastases diagnosis possibilities in studies with the use of 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG.
Tarnawska-Pierścińska M; Hołody Ł; Braziewicz J; Królicki L
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2011; 14(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 22219151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55.
Hazelton J; Kim S; Boerner JL; Podgorski I; Perk T; Cackowski F; Aoun HD; Heath EI
Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(12):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 37211866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Repeatability of Quantitative 18F-NaF PET: A Multicenter Study.
Lin C; Bradshaw T; Perk T; Harmon S; Eickhoff J; Jallow N; Choyke PL; Dahut WL; Larson S; Humm JL; Perlman S; Apolo AB; Morris MJ; Liu G; Jeraj R
J Nucl Med; 2016 Dec; 57(12):1872-1879. PubMed ID: 27445292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Skeletal Metastases and Benign Mimics on NaF PET/CT: A Pictorial Review.
Panagiotidis E; Lam K; Mistry A; Seshadri N; Vinjamuri S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):W64-W74. PubMed ID: 29702023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The value of quantitative analysis in
Lapa P; Marques M; Costa G; Lima JP
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 27793635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Uptake of Radium-223 Dichloride and Early [
Letellier A; Johnson AC; Kit NH; Savigny JF; Batalla A; Parienti JJ; Aide N
Mol Imaging Biol; 2018 Jun; 20(3):482-491. PubMed ID: 29027074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. F-18 NaF PET for detection of bone metastases in lung cancer: accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and impact on patient management.
Hetzel M; Arslandemir C; König HH; Buck AK; Nüssle K; Glatting G; Gabelmann A; Hetzel J; Hombach V; Schirrmeister H
J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Dec; 18(12):2206-14. PubMed ID: 14672356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
