146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37751531)
21. Risk of peri-intubation adverse events during emergency department intubation of overdose patients: a national emergency airway registry (near) analysis.
Kunzler NM; Cole JB; Driver BE; Carlson J; April M; Brown CA
Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2022 Dec; 60(12):1293-1298. PubMed ID: 36346031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The HEAVEN criteria predict laryngoscopic view and intubation success for both direct and video laryngoscopy: a cohort analysis.
Nausheen F; Niknafs NP; MacLean DJ; Olvera DJ; Wolfe AC; Pennington TW; Davis DP
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2019 Apr; 27(1):50. PubMed ID: 31018857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Conventional Versus Video Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Tube Exchange: Glottic Visualization, Success Rates, Complications, and Rescue Alternatives in the High-Risk Difficult Airway Patient.
Mort TC; Braffett BH
Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):440-8. PubMed ID: 26111264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in the emergency department.
Vassiliadis J; Tzannes A; Hitos K; Brimble J; Fogg T
Emerg Med Australas; 2015 Apr; 27(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 25640845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Pediatric Rigid Stylet Improves First-Pass Success Compared With the Standard Malleable Stylet and Tracheal Tube Introducer in a Simulated Pediatric Emergency Intubation.
Pacheco GS; Leetch AN; Patanwala AE; Hurst NB; Mendelson JS; Sakles JC
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2023 Jun; 39(6):423-427. PubMed ID: 35876757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of GlideScope® video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations.
Sakles JC; Mosier JM; Chiu S; Keim SM
J Emerg Med; 2012 Apr; 42(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 21689899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using Video-recorded Laryngoscopy to Evaluate Laryngoscopic Blade Approach and Adverse Events in Children.
Green-Hopkins I; Werner H; Monuteaux MC; Nagler J
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1283-9. PubMed ID: 26468891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. First-Pass Success Intubations Using Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy: A Retrospective Prehospital Ambulance Service Study.
Eberlein CM; Luther IS; Carpenter TA; Ramirez LD
Air Med J; 2019; 38(5):356-358. PubMed ID: 31578974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. EMS Intubation Improves with King Vision Video Laryngoscopy.
Jarvis JL; McClure SF; Johns D
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2015; 19(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 25909850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The impact of video laryngoscopy on the first-pass success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation in The Netherlands: a retrospective observational study.
Maissan I; van Lieshout E; de Jong T; van Vledder M; Houmes RJ; Hartog DD; Stolker RJ
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2022 Oct; 48(5):4205-4213. PubMed ID: 35362731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical Experience With the C-MAC and GlideScope in a Pediatric Emergency Department Over a 10-Year Period.
Pacheco GS; Patanwala AE; Mendelson JS; Sakles JC
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2021 Dec; 37(12):e1098-e1103. PubMed ID: 31503130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of emergency pediatric tracheal intubation by pediatric anesthesiologists on inpatient units and the emergency department.
Bai W; Golmirzaie K; Burke C; Van Veen T; Christensen R; Voepel-Lewis T; Malviya S
Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Apr; 26(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 26738465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Use of Video Laryngoscopy Did Not Lead to Greater First-Pass or Overall Success Rates Compared to Direct Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Intubation in a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service.
Frascone R; Delp C; Kolbet K; Pasquarella C; Pasquarella J; Dalrymple KA; Wewerka S
Air Med J; 2022; 41(2):243-247. PubMed ID: 35307151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.
Mosier J; Chiu S; Patanwala AE; Sakles JC
Ann Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 61(4):414-420.e1. PubMed ID: 23374414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Endotracheal Intubation with the King Laryngeal Tube™ In Situ Using Video Laryngoscopy and a Bougie: A Retrospective Case Series and Cadaveric Crossover Study.
Dodd KW; Kornas RL; Prekker ME; Klein LR; Reardon RF; Driver BE
J Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 52(4):403-408. PubMed ID: 27876327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact of video laryngoscopy use during urgent endotracheal intubation in the critically ill.
Kory P; Guevarra K; Mathew JP; Hegde A; Mayo PH
Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 23687228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use of a video laryngoscope by emergency medicine residents is associated with a reduction in esophageal intubations in the emergency department.
Sakles JC; Javedani PP; Chase E; Garst-Orozco J; Guillen-Rodriguez JM; Stolz U
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jun; 22(6):700-7. PubMed ID: 25996773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.
Sakles JC; Mosier J; Chiu S; Cosentino M; Kalin L
Ann Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 60(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 22560464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy Using the C-MAC for Tracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department, a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Driver BE; Prekker ME; Moore JC; Schick AL; Reardon RF; Miner JR
Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 23(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 26850232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Bougie and First-Pass Success in the Emergency Department.
Driver B; Dodd K; Klein LR; Buckley R; Robinson A; McGill JW; Reardon RF; Prekker ME
Ann Emerg Med; 2017 Oct; 70(4):473-478.e1. PubMed ID: 28601269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
