These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37751777)

  • 1. Ethical implications for dermatology of the Supreme Court's decision on affirmative action.
    Ferreira AL; Stoff B; Grant-Kels JM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37751777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implications of the Supreme Court's affirmative action decision on underrepresented populations and dermatology.
    Trepanowski N; Grant-Kels JM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 Dec; 89(6):1320-1321. PubMed ID: 37579841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The US Supreme Court and Affirmative Action: The Negative Impact on the Physician Workforce.
    Boumil MM; Beninger P; Curfman GD
    Clin Ther; 2023 Oct; 45(10):1004-1007. PubMed ID: 37666713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Supreme Court's Rulings on Race Neutrality Threaten Progress in Medicine and Health.
    Schmidt H; Gostin LO; Williams MA
    JAMA; 2023 Sep; 330(11):1033-1034. PubMed ID: 37429018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preserving diversity in healthcare after the US Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling.
    Yang YT; Sudarshan S
    BMJ; 2023 Jul; 382():1691. PubMed ID: 37479230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Supreme Court Decision on Affirmative Action-Fewer Black Physicians and More Health Disparities for Minoritized Groups.
    Montgomery Rice V; Elks ML; Howse M
    JAMA; 2023 Sep; 330(11):1035-1036. PubMed ID: 37624606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The consequences of premature abandonment of affirmative action in medical school admissions.
    Cohen JJ
    JAMA; 2003 Mar; 289(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 12622585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Affirmative action after the Supreme Court's 1988-1989 term: what employers need to know.
    Thacker RA
    Employ Relat Today; 1990; 17(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 10105600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How the SCOTUS Affirmative Action Ruling Could Affect Medical Schools and Health Care.
    Rubin R
    JAMA; 2023 Aug; 330(6):492-494. PubMed ID: 37466968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Science needs affirmative action.
    Thorp HH
    Science; 2022 Feb; 375(6580):473. PubMed ID: 35113695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Raising the bar on achieving racial diversity in higher education: the United States Supreme Court's decision in Fisher v University of Texas.
    Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J; Scott J
    Acad Med; 2013 Dec; 88(12):1792-4. PubMed ID: 24128633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Much Information is Enough? Understanding the Alabama Supreme Court's Expansion of the Causation Standard in Failure to Warn Claims.
    Herr A
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Mar; 49(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 37376912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Too young to kill? U.S. Supreme Court treads a dangerous path in Roper v. Simmons.
    Sarkar SP
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 17872560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. After Cruzan. The U. S. Supreme Court's decision settles the case but raises new questions.
    Johnson SH
    Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):38-41, 57. PubMed ID: 10107437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diversity, trust, and patient care: affirmative action in medical education 25 years after Bakke.
    DeVille K; Kopelman LM
    J Med Philos; 2003 Aug; 28(4):489-516. PubMed ID: 14610693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating Intellectual Disability after the
    Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 31533993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Holistic versus actuarial student selection.
    McGaghie WC; Kreiter CD
    Teach Learn Med; 2005; 17(1):89-91. PubMed ID: 15691821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A decade-long longitudinal survey shows that the Supreme Court is now much more conservative than the public.
    Jessee S; Malhotra N; Sen M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jun; 119(24):e2120284119. PubMed ID: 35666873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion Disclosure Laws and the First Amendment: The Broader Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's Becerra Decision.
    Pomeranz JL
    Am J Public Health; 2019 Mar; 109(3):412-418. PubMed ID: 30676798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court.
    Yang YT; Kozhimannil KB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 26942359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.