These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37753814)

  • 1. A diagnosis of the primary difference between EuroForMix and STRmix™.
    Buckleton J; Susik M; Curran JM; Cheng K; Taylor D; Bright JA; Kelly H; Wivell R
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 37753814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix™.
    Cheng K; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Curran J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2138-2155. PubMed ID: 34553371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Review of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems:
    Gill P; Benschop C; Buckleton J; Bleka Ø; Taylor D
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 34680954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
    Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An inter-laboratory comparison of probabilistic genotyping parameters and evaluation of performance on DNA mixtures from different laboratories.
    Boodoosingh S; Kelly H; Curran JM; Kalafut T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103046. PubMed ID: 38598920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRMix™ and TrueAllele™.
    Thompson WC
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 36847295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. STRmix™ collaborative exercise on DNA mixture interpretation.
    Bright JA; Cheng K; Kerr Z; McGovern C; Kelly H; Moretti TR; Smith MA; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Coble MD; Alghafri R; Allen PS; Barber A; Beamer V; Buettner C; Russell M; Gehrig C; Hicks T; Charak J; Cheong-Wing K; Ciecko A; Davis CT; Donley M; Pedersen N; Gartside B; Granger D; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Reisinger E; Kennedy J; Grammer E; Kaplan M; Hansen D; Larsen HJ; Laureano A; Li C; Lien E; Lindberg E; Kelly C; Mallinder B; Malsom S; Yacovone-Margetts A; McWhorter A; Prajapati SM; Powell T; Shutler G; Stevenson K; Stonehouse AR; Smith L; Murakami J; Halsing E; Wright D; Clark L; Taylor DA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():1-8. PubMed ID: 30665115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic evaluation of STRmix™ performance on degraded DNA profile data.
    Duke KR; Myers SP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102174. PubMed ID: 31707114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An assessment of the performance of the probabilistic genotyping software EuroForMix: Trends in likelihood ratios and analysis of Type I & II errors.
    Benschop CCG; Nijveld A; Duijs FE; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():31-38. PubMed ID: 31212207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; McGovern C; Cooper S; Russell L; Abarno D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():226-239. PubMed ID: 27235797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST.
    Bright JA; Richards R; Kruijver M; Kelly H; McGovern C; Magee A; McWhorter A; Ciecko A; Peck B; Baumgartner C; Buettner C; McWilliams S; McKenna C; Gallacher C; Mallinder B; Wright D; Johnson D; Catella D; Lien E; O'Connor C; Duncan G; Bundy J; Echard J; Lowe J; Stewart J; Corrado K; Gentile S; Kaplan M; Hassler M; McDonald N; Hulme P; Oefelein RH; Montpetit S; Strong M; Noël S; Malsom S; Myers S; Welti S; Moretti T; McMahon T; Grill T; Kalafut T; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Beamer V; Taylor DA; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():11-24. PubMed ID: 29367014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.
    Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Gittelson S; Moretti TR; Onorato AJ; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Taylor DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):393-405. PubMed ID: 30132900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A mixed DNA profile controversy revisited.
    Kalafut T; Pugh S; Gill P; Abbas S; Semaan M; Mansour I; Curran J; Bright JA; Hicks T; Wivell R; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 34651300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probabilistic genotyping of single cell replicates from complex DNA mixtures recovers higher contributor LRs than standard analysis.
    Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 35277229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using the Nondonor Distribution to Improve Communication and Inform Decision Making for Low LRs from Minor Contributors in Mixed DNA Profiles.
    Schuerman C; Kalafut T; Buchanan C; Sutton J; Bright JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1072-1084. PubMed ID: 32134501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo genotyping algorithm on PROVEDIt mixtures including a novel precision benchmark.
    Susik M; Sbalzarini IF
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 May; 64():102840. PubMed ID: 36764220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A sensitivity analysis to determine the robustness of STRmix™ with respect to laboratory calibration.
    Kelly H; Bright JA; Kruijver M; Cooper S; Taylor D; Duke K; Strong M; Beamer V; Buettner C; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():113-122. PubMed ID: 29727813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation into the effect of mixtures comprising related people on non-donor likelihood ratios, and potential practises to mitigate providing misleading opinions.
    Kalafut T; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102691. PubMed ID: 35390645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Investigation into Compound Likelihood Ratios for Forensic DNA Mixtures.
    Wivell R; Kelly H; Kokoszka J; Daniels J; Dickson L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.