BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37753935)

  • 1. Reply to "Spatial Resolution Versus Contrast Resolution in Breast Ultrasound".
    Mendelson EB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Dec; 221(6):851-852. PubMed ID: 37753935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial Resolution Versus Contrast Resolution in Breast Ultrasound.
    Barr RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Dec; 221(6):851. PubMed ID: 37753936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Use of ultrasound contrast media for the assessment of vascularization of breast tumors].
    Bang N; Nielsen MB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Aug; 163(33):4374-6. PubMed ID: 11521573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Let us utilize breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound more.
    Ito T
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2018 Oct; 45(4):543-544. PubMed ID: 30269285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional reconstruction of fine vascularity in ultrasound breast imaging using contrast-enhanced spatial compounding: in vitro analyses.
    Hansen C; Hüttebräuker N; Wilkening W; Ermert H
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1155-64. PubMed ID: 18692757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advanced ultrasound techniques for breast imaging.
    Piccoli CW; Forsberg F
    Semin Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 21134529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to optimize breast ultrasound.
    Athanasiou A; Tardivon A; Ollivier L; Thibault F; El Khoury C; Neuenschwander S
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18818037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound characterizes equivocal breast lesions.
    D'Agincourt L
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Mar; 16(3):49-59. PubMed ID: 10146686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real-time ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced US for suspicious axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer - a love and hate relationship?
    Mostbeck G
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Feb; 31(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 20157867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New technologies in clinical ultrasound.
    Kamaya A; Machtaler S; Safari Sanjani S; Nikoozadeh A; Graham Sommer F; Pierre Khuri-Yakub BT; Willmann JK; Desser TS
    Semin Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 48(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 23796372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The breast.
    Cosgrove D
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9 Suppl 3():S401-2. PubMed ID: 10602938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Analysis of 127 Cases.
    Li W; Zhou Q; Xia S; Wu Y; Fei X; Wang Y; Tao L; Fan J; Zhou W
    J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jan; 39(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 31206200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound for sentinel lymph node detection: ready for prime time?
    Yang WT; Goldberg BB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):249-50. PubMed ID: 21257872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extended field of view in breast sonography.
    Catalano O; Mattace Raso M; Petrillo A; Gallipoli D'Errico A
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Apr; 32(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 21465424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Different Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.
    Liang X; Li Z; Zhang L; Wang D; Tian J
    Ultrason Imaging; 2020 Nov; 42(6):261-270. PubMed ID: 33019918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement in breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonazoid
    Haga M; Hirai T; Nakai T; Kobayashi T; Nakamura T; Marugami A; Ito T; Takewa M; Marugami N; Kichikawa K
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Oct; 47(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 32989596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: imaging findings mimicking malignancy and histopathological features.
    Ruiz-Delgado ML; López-Ruiz JA; Eizaguirre B; Saiz A; Astigarraga E; Fernández-Temprano Z
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Feb; 48(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 17325921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing the Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
    Lee SC; Grant E; Sheth P; Garcia AA; Desai B; Ji L; Groshen S; Hwang D; Yamashita M; Hovanessian-Larsen L
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 May; 36(5):901-911. PubMed ID: 28150325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Differentiation of Breast Lesions: A Meta-analysis.
    Ma X; Liu R; Zhu C; Zhang J; Ling W
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2095-102. PubMed ID: 27503752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging in Invasive Breast Cancer: A Novel Technique to Obtain Histopathologic Information of Microvessel Density.
    Mori N; Mugikura S; Takahashi S; Ito K; Takasawa C; Li L; Miyashita M; Kasajima A; Mori Y; Ishida T; Kodama T; Takase K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):607-614. PubMed ID: 28041744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.