251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37756652)
1. Monte Carlo simulation-based patient-specific QA using machine log files for line-scanning proton radiation therapy.
Jeon C; Lee J; Shin J; Cheon W; Ahn S; Jo K; Han Y
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7139-7153. PubMed ID: 37756652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. FLASH dose rate calculation based on log files in proton pencil beam scanning therapy.
Jeon C; Ahn S; Amano D; Kamiguchi N; Cho S; Sheen H; Park HC; Han Y
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7154-7166. PubMed ID: 37431587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy.
Testa M; Schümann J; Lu HM; Shin J; Faddegon B; Perl J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121719. PubMed ID: 24320505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of novel measurement-based patient-specific QA for pencil beam scanning proton FLASH radiotherapy.
Huang S; Yang Y; Wei S; Kang M; Tsai P; Chen CC; Yuan Z; Choi JI; Tome WA; Simone CB; Lin H
Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4533-4545. PubMed ID: 37198998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monte Carlo based, patient-specific RapidArc QA using Linac log files.
Teke T; Bergman AM; Kwa W; Gill B; Duzenli C; Popescu IA
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 20175472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Platform for automatic patient quality assurance via Monte Carlo simulations in proton therapy.
Guterres Marmitt G; Pin A; Ng Wei Siang K; Janssens G; Souris K; Cohilis M; Langendijk JA; Both S; Knopf A; Meijers A
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():49-57. PubMed ID: 31968277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning.
Fracchiolla F; Lorentini S; Widesott L; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):8601-19. PubMed ID: 26501569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of an optimal GATE model for proton pencil-beam scanning delivery.
Asadi A; Akhavanallaf A; Hosseini SA; Vosoughi N; Zaidi H
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 36424313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single pencil beam benchmark of a module for Monte Carlo simulation of proton transport in the PENELOPE code.
Verbeek N; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Smyczek S; Timmermann B; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):456-476. PubMed ID: 33217026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical note: Evaluation and second check of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine for small-field apertures in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Holmes J; Shen J; Shan J; Patrick CL; Wong WW; Foote RL; Patel SH; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3497-3506. PubMed ID: 35305269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a log file analysis tool for proton patient QA, system performance tracking, and delivered dose reconstruction.
Ates O; Pirlepesov F; Zhao L; Hua CH; Merchant TE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13972. PubMed ID: 36951089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Highly efficient and sensitive patient-specific quality assurance for spot-scanned proton therapy.
Johnson JE; Beltran C; Wan Chan Tseung H; Mundy DW; Kruse JJ; Whitaker TJ; Herman MG; Furutani KM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212412. PubMed ID: 30763390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of GATE-RTion (GATE/Geant4) Monte Carlo simulation settings for proton pencil beam scanning quality assurance.
Winterhalter C; Taylor M; Boersma D; Elia A; Guatelli S; Mackay R; Kirkby K; Maigne L; Ivanchenko V; Resch AF; Sarrut D; Sitch P; Vidal M; Grevillot L; Aitkenhead A
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5817-5828. PubMed ID: 32967037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric validation of a GPU-based dose engine for a fast in silico patient-specific quality assurance program in light ion beam therapy.
Magro G; Fassi M; Mirandola A; Rossi E; Molinelli S; Russo S; Bazani A; Vai A; Ciocca M; Donetti M; Mairani A
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7802-7814. PubMed ID: 36196033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of machine log files/MC-based treatment planning and delivery QA as compared to ArcCHECK QA.
Stanhope CW; Drake DG; Liang J; Alber M; Söhn M; Habib C; Willcut V; Yan D
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2864-2874. PubMed ID: 29676463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
