These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37757989)
1. A representation of abstract linguistic categories in the visual system underlies successful lipreading. Nidiffer AR; Cao CZ; O'Sullivan A; Lalor EC Neuroimage; 2023 Nov; 282():120391. PubMed ID: 37757989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lip-Reading Enables the Brain to Synthesize Auditory Features of Unknown Silent Speech. Bourguignon M; Baart M; Kapnoula EC; Molinaro N J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(5):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 31889007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential Auditory and Visual Phase-Locking Are Observed during Audio-Visual Benefit and Silent Lip-Reading for Speech Perception. Aller M; Økland HS; MacGregor LJ; Blank H; Davis MH J Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 42(31):6108-6120. PubMed ID: 35760528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lipreading and covert speech production similarly modulate human auditory-cortex responses to pure tones. Kauramäki J; Jääskeläinen IP; Hari R; Möttönen R; Rauschecker JP; Sams M J Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 30(4):1314-21. PubMed ID: 20107058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased Connectivity among Sensory and Motor Regions during Visual and Audiovisual Speech Perception. Peelle JE; Spehar B; Jones MS; McConkey S; Myerson J; Hale S; Sommers MS; Tye-Murray N J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(3):435-442. PubMed ID: 34815317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seeing speech: visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex. Sams M; Aulanko R; Hämäläinen M; Hari R; Lounasmaa OV; Lu ST; Simola J Neurosci Lett; 1991 Jun; 127(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 1881611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual speech perception without primary auditory cortex activation. Bernstein LE; Auer ET; Moore JK; Ponton CW; Don M; Singh M Neuroreport; 2002 Mar; 13(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 11930129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study. Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Adaptation as Induced by Lexical and Audiovisual Context. Ullas S; Hausfeld L; Cutler A; Eisner F; Formisano E J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 32(11):2145-2158. PubMed ID: 32662723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptation of neuromagnetic N1 responses to phonetic stimuli by visual speech in humans. Jääskeläinen IP; Ojanen V; Ahveninen J; Auranen T; Levänen S; Möttönen R; Tarnanen I; Sams M Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2741-4. PubMed ID: 15597045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How are visemes and graphemes integrated with speech sounds during spoken word recognition? ERP evidence for supra-additive responses during audiovisual compared to auditory speech processing. Pattamadilok C; Sato M Brain Lang; 2022 Feb; 225():105058. PubMed ID: 34929531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The self-advantage in visual speech processing enhances audiovisual speech recognition in noise. Tye-Murray N; Spehar BP; Myerson J; Hale S; Sommers MS Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1048-53. PubMed ID: 25421408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audio-visual speech perception in schizophrenia: an fMRI study. Surguladze SA; Calvert GA; Brammer MJ; Campbell R; Bullmore ET; Giampietro V; David AS Psychiatry Res; 2001 Feb; 106(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11231095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]