These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37761593)

  • 1. Conserving Semantic Unit Information and Simplifying Syntactic Constituents to Improve Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition.
    Fang Z; Cong Y; Chai Y; Gao C; Chen X; Qiu J
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Sep; 25(9):. PubMed ID: 37761593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of word and graph embedding to measure semantic relatedness between Unified Medical Language System concepts.
    Mao Y; Fung KW
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Oct; 27(10):1538-1546. PubMed ID: 33029614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Improved BERT and Syntactic Dependency Representation Model for Sentiment Analysis.
    Liu W; Yi J; Hu Z; Gao Y
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():5754151. PubMed ID: 35571684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WORD SUBSTITUTION ERRORS ON SENTENCE EMBEDDINGS.
    Voleti R; Liss JM; Berisha V
    Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process; 2019 May; 2019():7315-7319. PubMed ID: 33376454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein-protein interaction relation extraction based on multigranularity semantic fusion.
    Li Y; Chen Y; Qin Y; Hu Y; Huang R; Zheng Q
    J Biomed Inform; 2021 Nov; 123():103931. PubMed ID: 34628063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ADPG: Biomedical entity recognition based on Automatic Dependency Parsing Graph.
    Yang Y; Lin H; Yang Z; Zhang Y; Zhao D; Huai S
    J Biomed Inform; 2023 Apr; 140():104317. PubMed ID: 36804374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discourse influences during parsing are delayed.
    Rayner K; Garrod S; Perfetti CA
    Cognition; 1992 Nov; 45(2):109-39. PubMed ID: 1451412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The biomedical discourse relation bank.
    Prasad R; McRoy S; Frid N; Joshi A; Yu H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():188. PubMed ID: 21605399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic discourse connective detection in biomedical text.
    Ramesh BP; Prasad R; Miller T; Harrington B; Yu H
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012; 19(5):800-8. PubMed ID: 22744958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relation Extraction in Biomedical Texts Based on Multi-Head Attention Model With Syntactic Dependency Feature: Modeling Study.
    Li Y; Hui L; Zou L; Li H; Xu L; Wang X; Chua S
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Oct; 10(10):e41136. PubMed ID: 36264604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How working memory capacity modulates the time course of semantic integration at sentence and discourse level.
    Yang X; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Zhang Q; Li X
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Mar; 140():107383. PubMed ID: 32057933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-level semantic fusion network for Chinese medical named entity recognition.
    Shi J; Sun M; Sun Z; Li M; Gu Y; Zhang W
    J Biomed Inform; 2022 Sep; 133():104144. PubMed ID: 35878823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DAT-MT Accelerated Graph Fusion Dependency Parsing Model for Small Samples in Professional Fields.
    Li R; Shu S; Wang S; Liu Y; Li Y; Peng M
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Oct; 25(10):. PubMed ID: 37895565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Favor referential representations.
    Frazier L; McNamara P
    Brain Lang; 1995 Jun; 49(3):224-40. PubMed ID: 7640964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Document-Level Biomedical Relation Extraction Using Graph Convolutional Network and Multihead Attention: Algorithm Development and Validation.
    Wang J; Chen X; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Wen J; Lin H; Yang Z; Wang X
    JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e17638. PubMed ID: 32459636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How is sentence processing affected by external semantic and syntactic information? Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Schacht A; Martín-Loeches M; Casado P; Abdel Rahman R; Sel A; Sommer W
    PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9742. PubMed ID: 20305820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unsupervised low-dimensional vector representations for words, phrases and text that are transparent, scalable, and produce similarity metrics that are not redundant with neural embeddings.
    Smalheiser NR; Cohen AM; Bonifield G
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Feb; 90():103096. PubMed ID: 30654030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deriving a probabilistic syntacto-semantic grammar for biomedicine based on domain-specific terminologies.
    Fan JW; Friedman C
    J Biomed Inform; 2011 Oct; 44(5):805-14. PubMed ID: 21549857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.