211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37762891)
21. Additive Manufacturing: A Comparative Analysis of Dimensional Accuracy and Skin Texture Reproduction of Auricular Prostheses Replicas.
Unkovskiy A; Spintzyk S; Axmann D; Engel EM; Weber H; Huettig F
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e460-e468. PubMed ID: 29125215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Extraoral implants in the rehabilitation of craniofacial defects: implant and prosthesis survival rates and peri-implant soft tissue evaluation.
Curi MM; Oliveira MF; Molina G; Cardoso CL; Oliveira Lde G; Branemark PI; Ribeiro Kde C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1551-7. PubMed ID: 22698291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CAD/CAM-Assisted Auricular Prosthesis Fabrication for a Quick, Precise, and More Retentive Outcome: A Clinical Report.
Yadav S; Narayan AI; Choudhry A; Balakrishnan D
J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):616-621. PubMed ID: 28118503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effectiveness of digital data acquisition technologies in the fabrication of maxillofacial prostheses - A systematic review.
Suresh N; Janakiram C; Nayar S; Krishnapriya VN; Mathew A
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(1):208-215. PubMed ID: 35024329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Planning implant positions for an auricular prosthesis with digital data.
Reitemeier B; Schöne C; Schreiber S; Stockmann F; Ullmann K; Eckelt U
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 22304747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computer-assisted implant placement and full-arch immediate loading with digitally prefabricated provisional prostheses without cast: a prospective pilot cohort study.
Makarov N; Pompa G; Papi P
Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Sep; 7(1):80. PubMed ID: 34486078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital Workflow of Auricular Rehabilitation: A Technical Report Using an Intraoral Scanner.
Ballo AM; Nguyen CT; Lee VSK
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):596-600. PubMed ID: 30887663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robot-assisted placement of craniofacial implants.
Klein M; Hein A; Lueth T; Bier J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 14579960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Presurgical confirmation of craniofacial implant locations in children requiring implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
Wang R
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Apr; 81(4):492-5. PubMed ID: 10095223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report.
Huang YH; Seelaus R; Zhao L; Patel PK; Cohen M
Int Med Case Rep J; 2016; 9():341-345. PubMed ID: 27843356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Image-Guided Placement of Osseointegrated Implants for Challenging Auricular, Orbital, and Rhinectomy Defects.
Choi KJ; Sajisevi MB; McClennen J; Kaylie DM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Oct; 125(10):801-7. PubMed ID: 27307422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Custom CAD/CAM implants for complex craniofacial reconstruction in children: Our experience based on 136 cases
Nguyen PD; Khechoyan DY; Phillips JH; Forrest CR
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Nov; 71(11):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 30220563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improved Construction of Auricular Prosthesis by Digital Technologies.
Nuseir A; Hatamleh M; Watson J; Al-Wahadni AM; Alzoubi F; Murad M
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):e502-5. PubMed ID: 26221855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A surgical guide for craniofacial implant placement for an implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
Ozçelik TB; Tanner PB
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):253-5. PubMed ID: 20362769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant retained auricular prostheses at a tertiary referral care centre.
Pruthi G; Bansal K; Jain V; Kumar Koli D
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2020; 10(3):266-275. PubMed ID: 32509517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A case report on implant retained auricular prosthesis: Bringing back hope and smile.
Gupta D; Thakkur R; Shah B
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2023; 14(1):152-156. PubMed ID: 37273440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Treatment outcome of bone-anchored craniofacial prostheses after tumor surgery.
Schoen PJ; Raghoebar GM; van Oort RP; Reintsema H; van der Laan BF; Burlage FR; Roodenburg JL; Vissink A
Cancer; 2001 Dec; 92(12):3045-50. PubMed ID: 11753982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical Outcome of Fully Digital Workflow for Single-Implant-Supported Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study.
Gianfreda F; Pesce P; Marcano E; Pistilli V; Bollero P; Canullo L
Dent J (Basel); 2022 Jul; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 36005237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Advantages and limitations of implant surgery with CAD/CAM surgical guides: A literature review.
Unsal GS; Turkyilmaz I; Lakhia S
J Clin Exp Dent; 2020 Apr; 12(4):e409-e417. PubMed ID: 32382391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
