158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37764168)
21. One-year operation of a 20-L submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for real domestic wastewater treatment at room temperature: Pursuing the optimal HRT and sustainable flux.
Ji J; Chen Y; Hu Y; Ohtsu A; Ni J; Li Y; Sakuma S; Hojo T; Chen R; Li YY
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 775():145799. PubMed ID: 33621884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A systematic optimization of piggery wastewater treatment with purple phototrophic bacteria.
Sepúlveda-Muñoz CA; de Godos I; Puyol D; Muñoz R
Chemosphere; 2020 Aug; 253():126621. PubMed ID: 32278906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A systematic comparison of the potential of microalgae-bacteria and purple phototrophic bacteria consortia for the treatment of piggery wastewater.
García D; de Godos I; Domínguez C; Turiel S; Bolado S; Muñoz R
Bioresour Technol; 2019 Mar; 276():18-27. PubMed ID: 30605835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Autotrophic sulfide removal by mixed culture purple phototrophic bacteria.
Egger F; Hülsen T; Tait S; Batstone DJ
Water Res; 2020 Sep; 182():115896. PubMed ID: 32830101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Low temperature treatment of domestic wastewater by purple phototrophic bacteria: Performance, activity, and community.
Hülsen T; Barry EM; Lu Y; Puyol D; Batstone DJ
Water Res; 2016 Sep; 100():537-545. PubMed ID: 27235774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Treatment of food waste recycling wastewater using anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor for biogas production in mainstream treatment process of domestic wastewater.
Jeong Y; Hermanowicz SW; Park C
Water Res; 2017 Oct; 123():86-95. PubMed ID: 28651084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biological CNP removal from meat-processing wastewater in an innovative high rate up-flow A
Abyar H; Younesi H; Bahramifar N; Zinatizadeh AA
Chemosphere; 2018 Dec; 213():197-204. PubMed ID: 30223124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Application of purple phototrophic bacteria in a biofilm photobioreactor for single cell protein production: Biofilm vs suspended growth.
Hülsen T; Sander EM; Jensen PD; Batstone DJ
Water Res; 2020 Aug; 181():115909. PubMed ID: 32492592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Achieving nitrogen and phosphorus removal at low C/N ratios without aeration through a novel phototrophic process.
Carvalho VCF; Kessler M; Fradinho JC; Oehmen A; Reis MAM
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Nov; 793():148501. PubMed ID: 34171805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of simultaneous organic matters and nutrients removal from municipal wastewater using a novel bioreactor (D-A
Ye C; Zhou Z; Li M; Liu Q; Xu T; Li J
J Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 218():509-515. PubMed ID: 29709819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Novel approach for the treatment of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Coupling thermal hydrolysis with anaerobic digestion and photo-fermentation.
Allegue LD; Puyol D; Melero JA
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 714():136845. PubMed ID: 32018982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance of anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactors using effluents of microbial fuel cells treating domestic wastewater.
Kim KY; Yang W; Ye Y; LaBarge N; Logan BE
Bioresour Technol; 2016 May; 208():58-63. PubMed ID: 26921870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of HRT (hydraulic retention time) and SRT (solid retention time) on the hydrolytic pre-treatment of urban wastewater.
Ligero P; de Vega A; Soto M
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(4):7-14. PubMed ID: 11575103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Wastewater treatment by microalgal membrane bioreactor: Evaluating the effect of organic loading rate and hydraulic residence time.
Ashadullah AKM; Shafiquzzaman M; Haider H; Alresheedi M; Azam MS; Ghumman AR
J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 1):111548. PubMed ID: 33126200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of sparging rate on permeate quality in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) treating leachate from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW).
Trzcinski AP; Stuckey DC
J Environ Manage; 2016 Mar; 168():67-73. PubMed ID: 26696607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long term operation of a phototrophic biological nutrient removal system: Impact of CO
Carvalho VCF; Fradinho JC; Oehmen A; Reis MAM
J Environ Manage; 2023 May; 334():117490. PubMed ID: 36801686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. High-rate activated sludge system for carbon management--Evaluation of crucial process mechanisms and design parameters.
Jimenez J; Miller M; Bott C; Murthy S; De Clippeleir H; Wett B
Water Res; 2015 Dec; 87():476-82. PubMed ID: 26260539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of operational conditions on the performance of UASB reactors for domestic wastewater treatment.
Leitão RC; Silva-Filho JA; Sanders W; van Haandel AC; Zeeman G; Lettinga G
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):299-305. PubMed ID: 16180442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of ORP, recycling rate, and HRT on simultaneous sulfate reduction and sulfur production in expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactors under micro-aerobic conditions for treating molasses distillery wastewater.
Qinglin X; Yanhong L; Shaoyuan B; Hongda J
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1253-62. PubMed ID: 22828303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Saline wastewater treatment with purple phototrophic bacteria.
Hülsen T; Hsieh K; Batstone DJ
Water Res; 2019 Sep; 160():259-267. PubMed ID: 31154123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
