158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37764168)
41. Impact of AnMBR operating conditions on anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge.
Dagnew M; Parker W
Water Environ Res; 2021 May; 93(5):703-713. PubMed ID: 32441047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Anaerobic hydrolysis of a municipal wastewater in a pilot-scale digester.
Alvarez JA; Zapico CA; Gómez M; Presas J; Soto M
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):223-30. PubMed ID: 12926692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of pentachlorophenol and chemical oxygen demand mass concentrations in influent on operational behaviors of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor.
Shen DS; He R; Liu XW; Long Y
J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 16513261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT) and sludge retention time (SRT) on the treatment of nitrobenzene in AMBR/CSTR reactor systems.
Kuscu OS; Sponza DT
Environ Technol; 2007 Mar; 28(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 17432381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Treatment of domestic sewage in a combined UASB/RBC system. Process optimization for irrigation purposes.
Tawfik A; Zeeman G; Klapwijk A; Sanders W; El-Gohary F; Lettinga G
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 12926629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Psychrophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater.
Smith AL; Skerlos SJ; Raskin L
Water Res; 2013 Mar; 47(4):1655-65. PubMed ID: 23295067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor followed by moving bed biofilm reactor.
Tawfik A; El-Gohary F; Temmink H
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2010 Feb; 33(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 19404682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Aggregation of purple bacteria in an upflow photobioreactor to facilitate solid/liquid separation: Impact of organic loading rate, hydraulic retention time and water composition.
Blansaer N; Alloul A; Verstraete W; Vlaeminck SE; Smets BF
Bioresour Technol; 2022 Mar; 348():126806. PubMed ID: 35131464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Performance of an intensive pond system treating municipal wastewater in a cold region.
Wang B; Qi P; Wang L; Lu W; Liu S; Zhao F
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(12):51-60. PubMed ID: 16114663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Municipal wastewater treatment by purple phototropic bacteria at low infrared irradiances using a photo-anaerobic membrane bioreactor.
Dalaei P; Bahreini G; Nakhla G; Santoro D; Batstone D; Hülsen T
Water Res; 2020 Apr; 173():115535. PubMed ID: 32014703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Operational Strategies to Selectively Produce Purple Bacteria for Microbial Protein in Raceway Reactors.
Alloul A; Cerruti M; Adamczyk D; Weissbrodt DG; Vlaeminck SE
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jun; 55(12):8278-8286. PubMed ID: 34085818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Significance of dissolved methane in effluents of anaerobically treated low strength wastewater and potential for recovery as an energy product: A review.
Crone BC; Garland JL; Sorial GA; Vane LM
Water Res; 2016 Nov; 104():520-531. PubMed ID: 27595700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. An urban biorefinery for food waste and biological sludge conversion into polyhydroxyalkanoates and biogas.
Moretto G; Russo I; Bolzonella D; Pavan P; Majone M; Valentino F
Water Res; 2020 Mar; 170():115371. PubMed ID: 31835138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effects of photoperiod on nutrient removal, biomass production, and algal-bacterial population dynamics in lab-scale photobioreactors treating municipal wastewater.
Lee CS; Lee SA; Ko SR; Oh HM; Ahn CY
Water Res; 2015 Jan; 68():680-91. PubMed ID: 25462772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Volatile fatty acids impacting phototrophic growth kinetics of purple bacteria: Paving the way for protein production on fermented wastewater.
Alloul A; Wuyts S; Lebeer S; Vlaeminck SE
Water Res; 2019 Apr; 152():138-147. PubMed ID: 30665160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Purple phototrophic bacteria for resource recovery: Challenges and opportunities.
Capson-Tojo G; Batstone DJ; Grassino M; Vlaeminck SE; Puyol D; Verstraete W; Kleerebezem R; Oehmen A; Ghimire A; Pikaar I; Lema JM; Hülsen T
Biotechnol Adv; 2020 Nov; 43():107567. PubMed ID: 32470594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Performance evaluation and energy potential analysis of anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) in the treatment of simulated milk wastewater.
Moideen SNF; Krishnan S; Li YY; Hassim MH; Kamyab H; Nasrullah M; Din MFM; Halim KA; Chaiprapat S
Chemosphere; 2023 Mar; 317():137923. PubMed ID: 36682635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactor (AnSMBR) treating municipal wastewater at ambient temperature: Operation and potential use for agricultural irrigation.
Peña M; do Nascimento T; Gouveia J; Escudero J; Gómez A; Letona A; Arrieta J; Fdz-Polanco F
Bioresour Technol; 2019 Jun; 282():285-293. PubMed ID: 30875596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Long-term semi-continuous production of carbohydrate-enriched microalgae biomass cultivated in low-loaded domestic wastewater.
Solís-Salinas CE; Patlán-Juárez G; Okoye PU; Guillén-Garcés A; Sebastian PJ; Arias DM
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 798():149227. PubMed ID: 34332386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Removal of residual dissolved methane gas in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating low-strength wastewater at low temperature with degassing membrane.
Bandara WM; Satoh H; Sasakawa M; Nakahara Y; Takahashi M; Okabe S
Water Res; 2011 May; 45(11):3533-40. PubMed ID: 21550096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
