141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37764564)
21.
Ibarra D; Martín-Sampedro R; Wicklein B; Borrero-López AM; Valencia C; Valdehíta A; Navas JM; Eugenio ME
Polymers (Basel); 2021 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 35012091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of pre-treatments mediated by endoglucanase and TEMPO oxidation for eco-friendly low-cost energy production of cellulose nanofibrils.
de Amorim Dos Santos A; Silva MJFE; Scatolino MV; Durães AFS; Dias MC; Damásio RAP; Tonoli GHD
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(2):4934-4948. PubMed ID: 35978240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Emerging Food Packaging Applications of Cellulose Nanocomposites: A Review.
Li J; Zhang F; Zhong Y; Zhao Y; Gao P; Tian F; Zhang X; Zhou R; Cullen PJ
Polymers (Basel); 2022 Sep; 14(19):. PubMed ID: 36235973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Nanotechnology Applied to Cellulosic Materials.
Fernandes A; Cruz-Lopes L; Esteves B; Evtuguin D
Materials (Basel); 2023 Apr; 16(8):. PubMed ID: 37109939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cellulose nanofibers isolated by TEMPO-oxidation and aqueous counter collision methods.
Van Hai L; Zhai L; Kim HC; Kim JW; Choi ES; Kim J
Carbohydr Polym; 2018 Jul; 191():65-70. PubMed ID: 29661322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of pH on Nanofibrillation of TEMPO-Oxidized Paper Mulberry Bast Fibers.
Park JY; Park CW; Han SY; Kwon GJ; Kim NH; Lee SH
Polymers (Basel); 2019 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 30960398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Recycling of TEMPO-mediated oxidation medium and its effect on nanocellulose properties.
Xu H; Sanchez-Salvador JL; Blanco A; Balea A; Negro C
Carbohydr Polym; 2023 Nov; 319():121168. PubMed ID: 37567710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) produced by different mechanical methods to improve mechanical properties of recycled paper.
Hu F; Zeng J; Cheng Z; Wang X; Wang B; Zeng Z; Chen K
Carbohydr Polym; 2021 Feb; 254():117474. PubMed ID: 33357928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Characterization and Antibacterial Properties of Autoclaved Carboxylated Wood Nanocellulose.
Chinga-Carrasco G; Johansson J; Heggset EB; Leirset I; Björn C; Agrenius K; Stevanic JS; Håkansson J
Biomacromolecules; 2021 Jul; 22(7):2779-2789. PubMed ID: 34185505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Scalable Preparation of Cellulose Nanofibers from Office Waste Paper by an Environment-Friendly Method.
Huang D; Hong H; Huang W; Zhang H; Hong X
Polymers (Basel); 2021 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 34578020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cellulose nanofibers from lignocellulosic biomass of lemongrass using enzymatic hydrolysis: characterization and cytotoxicity assessment.
Kumari P; Pathak G; Gupta R; Sharma D; Meena A
Daru; 2019 Dec; 27(2):683-693. PubMed ID: 31654377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Integrating direct reuse and extraction recovery of TEMPO for production of cellulose nanofibrils.
Chen S; Yue N; Cui M; Penkova A; Huang R; Qi W; He Z; Su R
Carbohydr Polym; 2022 Oct; 294():119803. PubMed ID: 35868763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cellulose nanofibrils prepared by twin-screw extrusion: Effect of the fiber pretreatment on the fibrillation efficiency.
Trigui K; De Loubens C; Magnin A; Putaux JL; Boufi S
Carbohydr Polym; 2020 Jul; 240():116342. PubMed ID: 32475596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Comparative Study on the Characterization of Nanofibers with Cellulose I, I/II, and II Polymorphs from Wood.
Wang H; Li S; Wu T; Wang X; Cheng X; Li D
Polymers (Basel); 2019 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 30960137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Properties of nanocellulose isolated from corncob residue using sulfuric acid, formic acid, oxidative and mechanical methods.
Liu C; Li B; Du H; Lv D; Zhang Y; Yu G; Mu X; Peng H
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Oct; 151():716-724. PubMed ID: 27474618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Nanofibrillated cellulose as an additive in papermaking process: A review.
Boufi S; González I; Delgado-Aguilar M; Tarrès Q; Pèlach MÀ; Mutjé P
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Dec; 154():151-66. PubMed ID: 27577906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cellulose Nanofibers from Softwood, Hardwood, and Tunicate: Preparation-Structure-Film Performance Interrelation.
Zhao Y; Moser C; Lindström ME; Henriksson G; Li J
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2017 Apr; 9(15):13508-13519. PubMed ID: 28350431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Nanocellulose from Spanish Harvesting Residues to Improve the Sustainability and Functionality of Linerboard Recycling Processes.
De Haro-Niza J; Rincón E; Gonzalez Z; Espinosa E; Rodríguez A
Nanomaterials (Basel); 2022 Dec; 12(24):. PubMed ID: 36558303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Surface functionalization and size modulate the formation of reactive oxygen species and genotoxic effects of cellulose nanofibrils.
Aimonen K; Imani M; Hartikainen M; Suhonen S; Vanhala E; Moreno C; Rojas OJ; Norppa H; Catalán J
Part Fibre Toxicol; 2022 Mar; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 35296350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Extraction of cellulose nanofibrils from dry softwood pulp using high shear homogenization.
Zhao J; Zhang W; Zhang X; Zhang X; Lu C; Deng Y
Carbohydr Polym; 2013 Sep; 97(2):695-702. PubMed ID: 23911503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
