163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37766568)
1. Assessment of factors associated with improved glycemic control after switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes.
Yamada E; Nakajima Y; Horiguchi K; Okada S; Yamada M
Endocr J; 2023 Dec; 70(12):1187-1193. PubMed ID: 37766568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing real-time and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes (ALERTT1): a 6-month, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
Lancet; 2021 Jun; 397(10291):2275-2283. PubMed ID: 34089660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lower Glycated Hemoglobin with Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than with Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring After 1 Year: The CORRIDA LIFE Study.
Radovnická L; Hásková A; Do QD; Horová E; Navrátilová V; Mikeš O; Cihlář D; Parkin CG; Grunberger G; Prázný M; Šoupal J
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2022 Dec; 24(12):859-867. PubMed ID: 36037056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Baseline User Characteristics on the Benefits of Real-Time Versus Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Moderator Analyses of the ALERTT1 Trial.
Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 May; 18(3):660-666. PubMed ID: 36172693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Real-world glycaemic outcomes in adult persons with type 1 diabetes using a real-time continuous glucose monitor compared to an intermittently scanned glucose monitor: A retrospective observational study from the Canadian LMC diabetes registry (REAL-CGM-T1D).
Brown RE; Chu L; Norman GJ; Abitbol A
Diabet Med; 2022 Nov; 39(11):e14937. PubMed ID: 36065977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Glycemic Metrics Measured Simultaneously by Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes.
Nørgaard SK; Mathiesen ER; Nørgaard K; Ringholm L
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2021 Oct; 23(10):665-672. PubMed ID: 34086494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hásková A; Radovnická L; Petruželková L; Parkin CG; Grunberger G; Horová E; Navrátilová V; Kádě O; Matoulek M; Prázný M; Šoupal J
Diabetes Care; 2020 Nov; 43(11):2744-2750. PubMed ID: 32859607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: 24-month results from the randomised ALERTT1 trial.
Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol; 2023 Feb; 11(2):96-108. PubMed ID: 36702566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the glycaemic outcomes between real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) among adults and children with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhou Y; Sardana D; Kuroko S; Haszard JJ; de Block MI; Weng J; Jefferies C; Wheeler BJ
Diabet Med; 2024 Mar; 41(3):e15280. PubMed ID: 38197238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Flash Glucose Monitoring and Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Treated with an Intensive Insulin Regimen: 1-Year Real-Life Retrospective Cohort Study.
Al Hayek AA; Al Dawish MA
Adv Ther; 2023 Jun; 40(6):2855-2868. PubMed ID: 37133646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Time In Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Using Treatment Strategies Based on Nonautomated Insulin Delivery Systems in the Real World.
Cherubini V; Bonfanti R; Casertano A; De Nitto E; Iannilli A; Lombardo F; Maltoni G; Marigliano M; Bassi M; Minuto N; Mozzillo E; Rabbone I; Rapini N; Rigamonti A; Salzano G; Scaramuzza A; Schiaffini R; Tinti D; Toni S; Zagaroli L; Zucchini S; Maffeis C; Gesuita R
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 Jul; 22(7):509-515. PubMed ID: 32073311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the clinical effects of intermittently scanned and real-time continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study.
Urakami T; Terada H; Yoshida K; Kuwabara R; Mine Y; Aoki M; Shoji Y; Suzuki J; Morioka I
J Diabetes Investig; 2022 Oct; 13(10):1745-1752. PubMed ID: 35532954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-utility analysis of Dexcom G6 real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus FreeStyle Libre 1 intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes in Belgium.
Visser MM; Van Muylder A; Charleer S; Isitt JJ; Roze S; De Block C; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Luyten J; Gillard P; Verhaeghe N
Diabetologia; 2024 Apr; 67(4):650-662. PubMed ID: 38236409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of flash glucose monitoring with real time continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Massa GG; Gys I; Bevilacqua E; Wijnands A; Zeevaert R
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 152():111-118. PubMed ID: 31121275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes.
Avari P; Moscardo V; Jugnee N; Oliver N; Reddy M
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):567-574. PubMed ID: 31375042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Interventional Evidence.
Seidu S; Kunutsor SK; Ajjan RA; Choudhary P
Diabetes Care; 2024 Jan; 47(1):169-179. PubMed ID: 38117991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term glycemic control and glucose variability assessed with continuous glucose monitoring in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: Determination of optimal sampling duration.
Piona C; Marigliano M; Mozzillo E; Franzese A; Zanfardino A; Iafusco D; Maltoni G; Zucchini S; Delvecchio M; Maffeis C
Pediatr Diabetes; 2020 Dec; 21(8):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 32935887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glycemic Metrics Derived From Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
Hansen KW; Bibby BM
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 Jan; 16(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 33269634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association Between Adherence, A1C Improvement, and Type of Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in People with Type 1 Diabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Intensive Insulin Therapy.
Nemlekar PM; Hannah KL; Green CR; Norman GJ
Diabetes Ther; 2024 Mar; 15(3):639-648. PubMed ID: 38289464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mediating Effects of Technology-Based Therapy on the Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Glycemic Management in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes.
Stanley JR; Clarke ABM; Shulman R; Mahmud FH
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2023 Mar; 25(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 36409503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
