These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. In vivo measurements of uterine cavities in 795 women of fertile age. Kurz KH; Tadesse E; Haspels AA Contraception; 1984 Jun; 29(6):495-510. PubMed ID: 6467940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical performance of the Multiload IUD. I. The influence of the endometrial cavity length. Castro A; Abarca L; Rios M Adv Contracept; 1993 Dec; 9(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 8147241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Uterine measurements in the fitting of intrauterine devices]. Theron F; Wessels PH S Afr Med J; 1984 Jun; 65(26):1054-6. PubMed ID: 6740420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of the endometrial cavity length using Wing Sound I. de Castro A; Yebra C; Aznar F; Pinilla E; Nieto A; Valenzuela P; Lopez-Salva A Adv Contracept; 1987 Jun; 3(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 3630822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Length of the endometrial cavity and intrauterine contraceptive device expulsion. Bahamondes MV; Monteiro I; Canteiro R; Fernandes Ados S; Bahamondes L Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Apr; 113(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 21272883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception. Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multicenter study assessing uterine cavity width in over 400 nulliparous women seeking IUD insertion using 2D and 3D sonography. Wildemeersch D; Hasskamp T; Nolte K; Jandi S; Pett A; Linden S; van Santen M; Julen O Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():232-238. PubMed ID: 27768966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Length of the endometrial cavity as measured by uterine sounding and ultrasonography in women of different parities. Canteiro R; Bahamondes MV; dos Santos Fernandes A; Espejo-Arce X; Marchi NM; Bahamondes L Contraception; 2010 Jun; 81(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 20472119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of uterine shape and size using Kurz's Cavimeter. de Castro A Adv Contracept; 1988 Jun; 4(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 3213668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adolescent experience with intrauterine device insertion and use: a retrospective cohort study. Bayer LL; Jensen JT; Li H; Nichols MD; Bednarek PH Contraception; 2012 Nov; 86(5):443-51. PubMed ID: 22560185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Avoidance of the dimensional incompatibility as the main reason for side effects in intrauterine contraception. Kurz KH Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Jan; 2(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12278585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Five years private practice experience of nulliparous women using copper IUD's. Smith RP; Goresky DM; Etchell DM Contraception; 1980 Apr; 21(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 7389354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of the use of intrauterine devices in nulliparous women. Graham S; Simcock BW Contraception; 1982 Oct; 26(4):323-46. PubMed ID: 6759026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A critical ('stress') evaluation of the combined ML Copper 250-short IUD in nulliparous women. Goldstuck ND Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Oct; 2(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 12336989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uterine metrology devices for IUD selection. Program for the Introduction and Adaptation of Contraceptive Technology PIACT PIACT Prod News; 1981 Nov; 3(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 12278959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]