These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37768481)

  • 1. Long-term memory for distractors: Effects of involuntary attention from working memory.
    Moriya J
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Feb; 52(2):401-416. PubMed ID: 37768481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of search-irrelevant working memory content on visual search.
    Calleja MO; Willoughby AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 36596986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the temporal dynamics and efficacy of task-relevant and task-irrelevant memory-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 35001208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?
    Rajsic J; Woodman GF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):269-279. PubMed ID: 30937674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The road to long-term memory: Top-down attention is more effective than bottom-up attention for forming long-term memories.
    Sasin E; Fougnie D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):937-945. PubMed ID: 33443709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forget Me if You Can: Attentional capture by to-Be-remembered and to-Be-forgotten visual stimuli.
    Sasin E; Morey CC; Nieuwenstein M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1643-1650. PubMed ID: 28074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature-based guidance of attention by visual working memory is applied independently of remembered object location.
    Hollingworth A; Bahle B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 31140137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention capture by episodic long-term memory.
    Nickel AE; Hopkins LS; Minor GN; Hannula DE
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104312. PubMed ID: 32387722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A secondary task is not always costly: Context-based guidance of visual search survives interference from a demanding working memory task.
    Annac E; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):381-399. PubMed ID: 30260470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Where working memory meets long-term memory: The interplay of list length and distractors on memory performance.
    Loaiza VM; Halse SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1455-1472. PubMed ID: 30070565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term memory and working memory compete and cooperate to guide attention.
    Hirschstein Z; Aly M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1517-1549. PubMed ID: 36303020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memory for a single object has differently variable precisions for relevant and irrelevant features.
    Swan G; Collins J; Wyble B
    J Vis; 2016; 16(3):32. PubMed ID: 26913624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning in repeated visual search.
    Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1267-82. PubMed ID: 20601709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Remembering more than you can say: Re-examining "amnesia" of attended attributes.
    Harrison GW; Kang M; Wilson DE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Mar; 214():103265. PubMed ID: 33601162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidance of attention from visual working memory is feature-based, not object-based: Implications for models of feature binding.
    Thayer DD; Bahle B; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 May; 151(5):1018-1034. PubMed ID: 34735186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Vision (Basel); 2019 Aug; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 31735843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.
    Williams LH; Drew T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):67-84. PubMed ID: 33000442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual mental imagery influences attentional guidance in a visual-search task.
    Moriya J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1127-1142. PubMed ID: 29654532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.