141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37768594)
1. Cashless gambling: Qualitative analysis of consumer perspectives regarding the harm minimization potential of digital payment systems for electronic gaming machines.
Swanton TB; Tsang S; Collard SB; Garbarino E; Gainsbury SM
Psychol Addict Behav; 2024 Jun; 38(4):451-464. PubMed ID: 37768594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consumer Perspectives on Gambling Harm Minimisation Measures in an Australian Jurisdiction.
Jackson AC; Christensen DR; Francis KL; Dowling NA
J Gambl Stud; 2016 Jun; 32(2):801-22. PubMed ID: 26440108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating changes in electronic gambling machine policy on user losses in an Australian jurisdiction.
Stevens M; Livingstone C
BMC Public Health; 2019 May; 19(1):517. PubMed ID: 31060524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attitudes towards community gambling venues and support for regulatory reform: an online panel study of residents in New South Wales, Australia.
Bestman A; Thomas SL; Randle M; Pitt H; Daube M
Harm Reduct J; 2018 Apr; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 29606138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public attitudes towards gambling product harm and harm reduction strategies: an online study of 16-88 year olds in Victoria, Australia.
Thomas SL; Randle M; Bestman A; Pitt H; Bowe SJ; Cowlishaw S; Daube M
Harm Reduct J; 2017 Jul; 14(1):49. PubMed ID: 28743300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DPS 2.0: on the road to a cashless society.
Anaza NA; Bennett DHS; Andonova Y; Anaza E
Mark Lett; 2022; 33(4):693-704. PubMed ID: 35915729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proximal and Distal Risk Factors for Gambling Problems Specifically Associated with Electronic Gaming Machines.
Hing N; Russell AMT
J Gambl Stud; 2020 Mar; 36(1):277-295. PubMed ID: 31172326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effects of Pop-up Harm Minimisation Messages on Electronic Gaming Machine Gambling Behaviour in New Zealand.
Palmer du Preez K; Landon J; Bellringer M; Garrett N; Abbott M
J Gambl Stud; 2016 Dec; 32(4):1115-1126. PubMed ID: 27038467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Frantic Seeking of Credit during Poker Machine Problem Gambling: A Public Health Perspective.
Oakes J; Pols R; Lawn S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(14):. PubMed ID: 32707743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A national public health programme on gambling policy development in New Zealand: insights from a process evaluation.
Kolandai-Matchett K; Landon J; Bellringer M; Abbott M
Harm Reduct J; 2018 Mar; 15(1):11. PubMed ID: 29510708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gambling expenditure predicts harm: evidence from a venue-level study.
Markham F; Young M; Doran B
Addiction; 2014 Sep; 109(9):1509-16. PubMed ID: 24773526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From problem people to addictive products: a qualitative study on rethinking gambling policy from the perspective of lived experience.
Miller HE; Thomas SL; Robinson P
Harm Reduct J; 2018 Apr; 15(1):16. PubMed ID: 29622018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gambling Participation, Expenditure and Risk of Harm in Australia, 1997-1998 and 2010-2011.
Armstrong AR; Thomas A; Abbott M
J Gambl Stud; 2018 Mar; 34(1):255-274. PubMed ID: 28840412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers.
Monaghan S; Blaszczynski A
J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):67-88. PubMed ID: 19730998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expert by Experience engagement in gambling reform: qualitative study of gamblers in the United Kingdom.
Nyemcsok C; Pitt H; Kremer P; Thomas SL
Health Promot Int; 2022 Apr; 37(2):. PubMed ID: 34304273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How Do People With Intellectual Disability Engage With and Understand Gambling? A Qualitative Study of Adults in Victoria, Australia.
Pitt H; Thomas SL; Watson J; Shuttleworth R; Murfitt K; Balandin S
Front Public Health; 2020; 8():536520. PubMed ID: 33511094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Electronic gaming machine accessibility and gambling problems: A natural policy experiment.
Russell AMT; Browne M; Hing N; Rockloff M; Newall P; Dowling NA; Merkouris S; King DL; Stevens M; Salonen AH; Breen H; Greer N; Thorne HB; Visintin T; Rawat V; Woo L
J Behav Addict; 2023 Oct; 12(3):721-732. PubMed ID: 37594879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three Contrasting Accounts of Electronic Gambling Machine Related Harm: Impacts on Community Views Towards Gambling Policy and Responsibility.
Myles D; O'Brien K; Yücel M; Carter A
J Gambl Stud; 2024 Mar; 40(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 37115423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects and Limitations of a Unique, Nationwide, Self-Exclusion Service for Gambling Disorder and Its Self-Perceived Effects and Harms in Gamblers: Protocol for a Qualitative Interview Study.
Håkansson A; Tjernberg J; Hansson H
JMIR Res Protoc; 2023 Nov; 12():e47528. PubMed ID: 37962917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of Consumer Protection Tools on Internet Gambling Sites: Customer Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers to Use.
Gainsbury SM; Angus DJ; Procter L; Blaszczynski A
J Gambl Stud; 2020 Mar; 36(1):259-276. PubMed ID: 31119509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
