These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37769480)

  • 1. Crash frequency prediction based on extreme value theory using roadside lidar-based vehicle trajectory data.
    Bhattarai N; Zhang Y; Liu H; Xu H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Dec; 193():107306. PubMed ID: 37769480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A crash prediction method based on bivariate extreme value theory and video-based vehicle trajectory data.
    Wang C; Xu C; Dai Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():365-373. PubMed ID: 30597330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validating the bivariate extreme value modeling approach for road safety estimation with different traffic conflict indicators.
    Zheng L; Sayed T; Essa M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():314-323. PubMed ID: 30562670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Random parameters Bayesian hierarchical modeling of traffic conflict extremes for crash estimation.
    Fu C; Sayed T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106159. PubMed ID: 33957475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel skateboarder-related near-crash identification method with roadside LiDAR data.
    Wu J; Zhang Y; Xu H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105438. PubMed ID: 32004863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel method of vehicle-pedestrian near-crash identification with roadside LiDAR data.
    Wu J; Xu H; Zheng Y; Tian Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():238-249. PubMed ID: 30265910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An improved vehicle-pedestrian near-crash identification method with a roadside LiDAR sensor.
    Wu J; Xu H; Zhang Y; Sun R
    J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():211-224. PubMed ID: 32563396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrating LiDAR Sensor Data into Microsimulation Model Calibration for Proactive Safety Analysis.
    Igene M; Luo Q; Jimee K; Soltanirad M; Bataineh T; Liu H
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jul; 24(13):. PubMed ID: 39001172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Near-crash risk identification and evaluation for takeout delivery motorcycles using roadside LiDAR.
    Lin C; Zhang S; Gong B; Liu H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 May; 199():107520. PubMed ID: 38412766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are collision and crossing course surrogate safety indicators transferable? A probability based approach using extreme value theory.
    Borsos A; Farah H; Laureshyn A; Hagenzieker M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105517. PubMed ID: 32480015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-type Bayesian hierarchical modeling of traffic conflict extremes for crash estimation.
    Fu C; Sayed T; Zheng L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 160():106309. PubMed ID: 34311954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A framework for proactive safety evaluation of intersection using surrogate safety measures and non-compliance behavior.
    Patel D; Hosseini P; Jalayer M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107264. PubMed ID: 37672846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the performance of traffic conflict measures in real-time crash risk prediction using pre-crash vehicle trajectories.
    Chen K; Xu C; Liu P; Li Z; Wang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107640. PubMed ID: 38759380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can post encroachment time substitute intersection characteristics in crash prediction models?
    Peesapati LN; Hunter MP; Rodgers MO
    J Safety Res; 2018 Sep; 66():205-211. PubMed ID: 30121107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the crash risk of mixed traffic on multilane rural highways using a proactive safety approach.
    Kar P; Venthuruthiyil SP; Chunchu M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107099. PubMed ID: 37159970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-stationary crash risk modelling of powered two-wheelers using extreme value analysis of surrogate crash events.
    Kar P; Venthuruthiyil SP; Chunchu M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Apr; 183():106973. PubMed ID: 36669456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An insight into the performance of road barriers - redistribution of barrier-relevant crashes.
    Zou Y; Tarko AP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():152-161. PubMed ID: 27529451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in frequency of occurrence, event characteristics, and pre-impact vehicle kinematics between crashes, near-crashes, and single vehicle conflicts in a large-scale naturalistic driving study.
    Perez MA; Sudweeks JD; Sears E; Valente J; Guo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 36548218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Approach-level real-time crash risk analysis for signalized intersections.
    Yuan J; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():274-289. PubMed ID: 30075396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.