These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37770262)
1. Robotic and laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: a prospective multicentre observational cohort study and economic evaluation in England. McCarthy A; Samarakoon D; Gray J; Mcmeekin P; McCarthy S; Newton C; Nobbenhuis M; Lippiatt J; Twigg J BMJ Open; 2023 Sep; 13(9):e073990. PubMed ID: 37770262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trial. Sculpher M; Manca A; Abbott J; Fountain J; Mason S; Garry R BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7432):134. PubMed ID: 14711748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared with second-generation endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: the HEALTH RCT. Cooper K; Breeman S; Scott NW; Scotland G; Hernández R; Clark TJ; Hawe J; Hawthorn R; Phillips K; Wileman S; McCormack K; Norrie J; Bhattacharya S Health Technol Assess; 2019 Sep; 23(53):1-108. PubMed ID: 31577219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for complex pediatric surgical conditions. Huang J; Huang Z; Mei H; Rong L; Zhou Y; Guo J; Wan L; Xu Y; Tang S Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov; 37(11):8404-8420. PubMed ID: 37721590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Garry R; Fountain J; Brown J; Manca A; Mason S; Sculpher M; Napp V; Bridgman S; Gray J; Lilford R Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jun; 8(26):1-154. PubMed ID: 15215018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimal access surgery amongst people with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease - a UK collaborative study. The REFLUX trial. Grant A; Wileman S; Ramsay C; Bojke L; Epstein D; Sculpher M; Macran S; Kilonzo M; Vale L; Francis J; Mowat A; Krukowski Z; Heading R; Thursz M; Russell I; Campbell M; Health Technol Assess; 2008 Sep; 12(31):1-181, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 18796263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary trabeculectomy versus primary glaucoma eye drops for newly diagnosed advanced glaucoma: TAGS RCT. King AJ; Fernie G; Hudson J; Kernohan A; Azuara-Blanco A; Burr J; Homer T; Shabaninejad H; Sparrow JM; Garway-Heath D; Barton K; Norrie J; McDonald A; Vale L; MacLennan G Health Technol Assess; 2021 Nov; 25(72):1-158. PubMed ID: 34854808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic evaluation of robot-assisted training versus an enhanced upper limb therapy programme or usual care for patients with moderate or severe upper limb functional limitation due to stroke: results from the RATULS randomised controlled trial. Fernandez-Garcia C; Ternent L; Homer TM; Rodgers H; Bosomworth H; Shaw L; Aird L; Andole S; Cohen D; Dawson J; Finch T; Ford G; Francis R; Hogg S; Hughes N; Krebs HI; Price C; Turner D; Van Wijck F; Wilkes S; Wilson N; Vale L BMJ Open; 2021 May; 11(5):e042081. PubMed ID: 34035087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BoTULS: a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A. Shaw L; Rodgers H; Price C; van Wijck F; Shackley P; Steen N; Barnes M; Ford G; Graham L; Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(26):1-113, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 20515600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating Cost-Effectiveness Using Alternative Preference-Based Scores and Within-Trial Methods: Exploring the Dynamics of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Using the EQ-5D 5-Level Version and Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index. Franklin M; Hunter RM; Enrique A; Palacios J; Richards D Value Health; 2022 Jun; 25(6):1018-1029. PubMed ID: 35667775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Group cognitive-behavioural programme to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis fatigue: the RAFT RCT with economic and qualitative evaluations. Hewlett S; Almeida C; Ambler N; Blair PS; Choy E; Dures E; Hammond A; Hollingworth W; Kadir B; Kirwan J; Plummer Z; Rooke C; Thorn J; Turner N; Pollock J Health Technol Assess; 2019 Oct; 23(57):1-130. PubMed ID: 31601357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 'PhysioDirect' telephone assessment and advice services for physiotherapy. Salisbury C; Foster NE; Hopper C; Bishop A; Hollinghurst S; Coast J; Kaur S; Pearson J; Franchini A; Hall J; Grove S; Calnan M; Busby J; Montgomery AA Health Technol Assess; 2013 Jan; 17(2):1-157, v-vi. PubMed ID: 23356839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: 5-year follow-up of multicentre randomised trial (the REFLUX trial). Grant AM; Boachie C; Cotton SC; Faria R; Bojke L; Epstein DM; Ramsay CR; Corbacho B; Sculpher M; Krukowski ZH; Heading RC; Campbell MK; Health Technol Assess; 2013 Jun; 17(22):1-167. PubMed ID: 23742987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of open colposuspension versus laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence. Dumville JC; Manca A; Kitchener HC; Smith AR; Nelson L; Torgerson DJ; BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1014-22. PubMed ID: 16956333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer. Lundin ES; Carlsson P; Wodlin NB; Nilsson L; Kjölhede P Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32863275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data to estimate cost-effectiveness of hernia surgery in England. Coronini-Cronberg S; Appleby J; Thompson J J R Soc Med; 2013 Jul; 106(7):278-87. PubMed ID: 23759893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation and Mirena® for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis. Bhattacharya S; Middleton LJ; Tsourapas A; Lee AJ; Champaneria R; Daniels JP; Roberts T; Hilken NH; Barton P; Gray R; Khan KS; Chien P; O'Donovan P; Cooper KG; ; Abbott J; Barrington J; Bhattacharya S; Bongers MY; Brun JL; Busfield R; Clark TJ; Cooper J; Cooper KG; Corson SL; Dickersin K; Dwyer N; Gannon M; Hawe J; Hurskainen R; Meyer WR; O'Connor H; Pinion S; Sambrook AM; Tam WH; van Zon-Rabelink IA; Zupi E Health Technol Assess; 2011 Apr; 15(19):iii-xvi, 1-252. PubMed ID: 21535970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Garside R; Pitt M; Anderson R; Rogers G; Dyer M; Mealing S; Somerville M; Price A; Stein K Health Technol Assess; 2007 Nov; 11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. PubMed ID: 17999840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomised clinical trial, observational study and assessment of cost-effectiveness of the treatment of varicose veins (REACTIV trial). Michaels JA; Campbell WB; Brazier JE; Macintyre JB; Palfreyman SJ; Ratcliffe J; Rigby K Health Technol Assess; 2006 Apr; 10(13):1-196, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16707070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]