163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37770383)
21. Intentions to participate in cervical and colorectal cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods study.
Wilson R; Quinn-Scoggins H; Moriarty Y; Hughes J; Goddard M; Cannings-John R; Whitelock V; Whitaker KL; Grozeva D; Townson J; Osborne K; Smits S; Robling M; Hepburn J; Moore G; Gjini A; Brain K; Waller J
Prev Med; 2021 Dec; 153():106826. PubMed ID: 34599921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Protection motivation theory in predicting intention to receive cervical cancer screening in rural Chinese women.
Bai Y; Liu Q; Chen X; Gao Y; Gong H; Tan X; Zhang M; Tuo J; Zhang Y; Xiang Q; Deng F; Liu G
Psychooncology; 2018 Feb; 27(2):442-449. PubMed ID: 28749603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Infographics on risks associated with COVID-19 and the willingness to get the AstraZeneca vaccine: two randomized online experiments.
Felgendreff L; Siegers R; Otten L; Betsch C
BMC Public Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):529. PubMed ID: 38378506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improving intervention design to promote cervical cancer screening among hard-to-reach women: assessing beliefs and predicting individual attendance probabilities in Bogotá, Colombia.
Barrera Ferro D; Bayer S; Brailsford S; Smith H
BMC Womens Health; 2022 Jun; 22(1):212. PubMed ID: 35672816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Increasing cervical cancer screening in Iran: effectiveness of a theory-based educational intervention.
Hosseini Z; Mohseni S; Momeni R; Aghamolaei T; Alavi A; Dadipoor S
Reprod Health; 2022 Sep; 19(1):186. PubMed ID: 36050727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of a decision aid about stratified ovarian cancer risk-management on women's knowledge and intentions: a randomised online experimental survey study.
Meisel SF; Freeman M; Waller J; Fraser L; Gessler S; Jacobs I; Kalsi J; Manchanda R; Rahman B; Side L; Wardle J; Lanceley A; Sanderson SC;
BMC Public Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):882. PubMed ID: 29145813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Community-Based Cervical Cancer Education: Changes in Knowledge and Beliefs Among Vietnamese American Women.
Fang CY; Lee M; Feng Z; Tan Y; Levine F; Nguyen C; Ma GX
J Community Health; 2019 Jun; 44(3):525-533. PubMed ID: 30915676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of numerical information on intention to participate in cervical screening among women offered HPV vaccination: a randomised study.
Hestbech MS; Gyrd-Hansen D; Kragstrup J; Siersma V; Brodersen J
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2016 Dec; 34(4):401-419. PubMed ID: 27845597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women.
Marlow LAV; Chorley AJ; Haddrell J; Ferrer R; Waller J
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 80():30-38. PubMed ID: 28535495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The impact of personalised risk information compared to a positive/negative result on informed choice and intention to undergo colonoscopy following colorectal Cancer screening in Scotland (PERICCS) - a randomised controlled trial: study protocol.
Steele RJC; Digby J; Chambers JA; O'Carroll RE
BMC Public Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):411. PubMed ID: 30991987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Changing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding cervical cancer screening: The effects of an educational intervention in rural Kenya.
Rosser JI; Njoroge B; Huchko MJ
Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Jul; 98(7):884-9. PubMed ID: 25858634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Racial and ethnic differences in cervical cancer screening barriers and intentions: The My Body My Test-3 HPV self-collection trial among under-screened, low-income women.
Zeno EE; Brewer NT; Spees LP; Des Marais AC; Sanusi BO; Hudgens MG; Jackson S; Barclay L; Wheeler SB; Smith JS
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0274974. PubMed ID: 36227948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of online infographics for enhancing health literacy among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized controlled trial.
Sutthiworapon S; Vichitkunakorn P; Choomalee K; Ngamchaliew P
BMC Prim Care; 2024 Mar; 25(1):87. PubMed ID: 38491433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mothers' attitudes in Japan regarding cervical cancer screening correlates with intention to recommend cervical cancer screening for daughters.
Egawa-Takata T; Ueda Y; Tanaka Y; Morimoto A; Kubota S; Yagi A; Terai Y; Ohmichi M; Ichimura T; Sumi T; Murata H; Okada H; Nakai H; Mandai M; Yoshino K; Kimura T; Saito J; Kudo R; Sekine M; Enomoto T; Horikoshi Y; Takagi T; Shimura K
Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 21(5):962-968. PubMed ID: 26968588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Challenges and opportunities for cervical screening in women over the age of 50 years: a qualitative study.
Bravington A; Chen H; Dyson J; Jones L; Dalgliesh C; Bryan A; Patnick J; Macleod U
Br J Gen Pract; 2022 Dec; 72(725):e873-e881. PubMed ID: 36192359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of a Web-Based Culturally Sensitive Educational Video to Facilitate Informed Cervical Cancer Screening Decisions Among Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch Women Aged 30 to 60 Years: Randomized Intervention Study.
Hamdiui N; Stein ML; van Steenbergen J; Crutzen R; Bouman M; Khan A; Çetin MN; Timen A; van den Muijsenbergh M
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Oct; 24(10):e35962. PubMed ID: 36287585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Variation in health beliefs across different types of cervical screening non-participants.
Marlow LAV; Ferrer RA; Chorley AJ; Haddrell JB; Waller J
Prev Med; 2018 Jun; 111():204-209. PubMed ID: 29550302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Psychological Impact of Primary Screening (PIPS) for HPV: a protocol for a cross-sectional evaluation within the NHS cervical screening programme.
McBride E; Marlow L; Forster AS; Moss S; Myles J; Kitchener H; Patnick J; Waller J
BMJ Open; 2016 Dec; 6(12):e014356. PubMed ID: 28011816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How does information on the harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening alter the intention to be screened?: a randomized survey of Norwegian women.
Iyer AL; Bundorf MK; Gyrd-Hansen D; Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Cyr PR; Sønbø Kristiansen I
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2019 Mar; 28(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29595751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Knowledge, attitude, practice and barriers of cervical cancer screening among women living in mid-western rural, Nepal.
Thapa N; Maharjan M; Petrini MA; Shah R; Shah S; Maharjan N; Shrestha N; Cai H
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 29(4):e57. PubMed ID: 29770627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
