These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37770844)

  • 21. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation of body weight in broiler chickens with pedigree or genomic relationships.
    Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Breen VP; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Feb; 51(1):6. PubMed ID: 30782121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of the mating design on the additive genetic variance in plant breeding populations.
    Lanzl T; Melchinger AE; Schön CC
    Theor Appl Genet; 2023 Oct; 136(11):236. PubMed ID: 37906322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Persistency of Prediction Accuracy and Genetic Gain in Synthetic Populations Under Recurrent Genomic Selection.
    Müller D; Schopp P; Melchinger AE
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Mar; 7(3):801-811. PubMed ID: 28064189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using egg production longitudinal recording to study the genetic background of resilience in purebred and crossbred laying hens.
    Bedere N; Berghof TVL; Peeters K; Pinard-van der Laan MH; Visscher J; David I; Mulder HA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Apr; 54(1):26. PubMed ID: 35439920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37235796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of infinitesimal and finite locus models for long-term breeding simulations with direct and maternal effects at the example of honeybees.
    Plate M; Bernstein R; Hoppe A; Bienefeld K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213270. PubMed ID: 30840680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Potential of gene drives with genome editing to increase genetic gain in livestock breeding programs.
    Gonen S; Jenko J; Gorjanc G; Mileham AJ; Whitelaw CB; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):3. PubMed ID: 28093068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction accuracies and genetic parameters for test-day traits from genomic and pedigree-based random regression models with or without heat stress interactions.
    Bohlouli M; Alijani S; Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):488-502. PubMed ID: 30343923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genomic Prediction Within and Across Biparental Families: Means and Variances of Prediction Accuracy and Usefulness of Deterministic Equations.
    Schopp P; Müller D; Wientjes YCJ; Melchinger AE
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Nov; 7(11):3571-3586. PubMed ID: 28916649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.
    See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33560334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bias in variance component estimation in swine crossbreeding schemes using selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies.
    See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Nov; 99(11):. PubMed ID: 34661671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A fast indirect method to compute functions of genomic relationships concerning genotyped and ungenotyped individuals, for diversity management.
    Colleau JJ; Palhière I; Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):87. PubMed ID: 29191178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs.
    Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):44. PubMed ID: 24171942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock.
    Ellen ED; Rodenburg TB; Albers GA; Bolhuis JE; Camerlink I; Duijvesteijn N; Knol EF; Muir WM; Peeters K; Reimert I; Sell-Kubiak E; van Arendonk JA; Visscher J; Bijma P
    Front Genet; 2014; 5():377. PubMed ID: 25426136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The breeding structure for the small ruminant resources in India.
    Gowane GR; Akram N; Misra SS; Chopra A; Sharma RC; Kumar A
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2020 Jul; 52(4):1717-1724. PubMed ID: 31898023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Benefits of testing in both bio-secure and production environments in genomic selection breeding programs for commercial broiler chicken.
    Chu TT; Alemu SW; Norberg E; Sørensen AC; Henshall J; Hawken R; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Nov; 50(1):52. PubMed ID: 30390619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predicting the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation from the genetic variance components in the parental lines.
    Duenk P; Bijma P; Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):10. PubMed ID: 33541267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of methods to study uniformity of traits: Application to birth weight in pigs.
    Sell-Kubiak E; Bijma P; Knol EF; Mulder HA
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Mar; 93(3):900-11. PubMed ID: 26020868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Accuracy and Bias of Single-Step Genomic Prediction for Populations Under Selection.
    Hsu WL; Garrick DJ; Fernando RL
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Aug; 7(8):2685-2694. PubMed ID: 28642364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.