These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37771362)

  • 1. Efficacy of Different Irrigant Activation Systems on Debris and Smear Layer Removal: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation.
    Wigler R; Herteanu M; Wilchfort Y; Kfir A
    Int J Dent; 2023; 2023():9933524. PubMed ID: 37771362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.
    Urban K; Donnermeyer D; Schäfer E; Bürklein S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2681-2687. PubMed ID: 28185091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Debris and smear removal in flattened root canals after use of different irrigant agitation protocols.
    Ribeiro EM; Silva-Sousa YT; Souza-Gabriel AE; Sousa-Neto MD; Lorencetti KT; Silva SR
    Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Jun; 75(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 22131294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of Different Irrigant Activation Systems on Smear Layer Removal: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.
    Miguéns-Vila R; Martín-Biedma B; Aboy-Pazos S; Uroz-Torres D; Álvarez-Nóvoa P; Dablanca-Blanco AB; Varela-Aneiros I; Castelo-Baz P
    J Clin Med; 2022 Feb; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 35207275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite.
    Plotino G; Colangeli M; Özyürek T; DeDeus G; Panzetta C; Castagnola R; Grande NM; Marigo L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jan; 25(1):237-245. PubMed ID: 32500405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation.
    Haupt F; Meinel M; Gunawardana A; Hülsmann M
    Aust Endod J; 2020 Apr; 46(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 30907051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effectiveness of Different Irrigation Techniques on Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Primary Mandibular Second Molars: An
    Hachem CE; Nehme W; Kaloustian MK; Ghosn N; Daou M; Zogheib C; Karam M; Mhanna R; Macaluso V; Kharouf N; Chedid JCA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1173-1179. PubMed ID: 37073943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant.
    Hata G; Hayami S; Weine FS; Toda T
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):308-17. PubMed ID: 11482143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of irrigant activation devices and conventional needle irrigation on smear layer and debris removal in curved canals. (Smear layer removal from irrigant activation using SEM).
    Andreani Y; Gad BT; Cocks TC; Harrison J; Keresztes ME; Pomfret JK; Rees EB; Ma D; Baloun BL; Rahimi M
    Aust Endod J; 2021 Aug; 47(2):143-149. PubMed ID: 33682268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of different irrigation techniques on smear layer removal in apical thirds of mesial root canals of permanent mandibular first molar: A scanning electron microscopic study.
    Khaord P; Amin A; Shah MB; Uthappa R; Raj N; Kachalia T; Kharod H
    J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 26180419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of Different Endodontic Irrigation and Activation Systems in Removal of the Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Karade P; Chopade R; Patil S; Hoshing U; Rao M; Rane N; Chopade A; Kulkarni A
    Iran Endod J; 2017; 12(4):414-418. PubMed ID: 29225634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Debris and Smear Layer Removal from Oval Root Canals Comparing XP-Endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and Manual Irrigation: A SEM Evaluation.
    Alakshar A; Saleh ARM; Gorduysus MO
    Eur J Dent; 2020 Oct; 14(4):626-633. PubMed ID: 32777834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Filling Debris and Smear Layer Removal Efficacy Using Various Root Canal Activation Systems during Endodontic Retreatment.
    Park SY; Kang MK; Choi HW; Shon WJ
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Nov; 56(11):. PubMed ID: 33207656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.
    Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Armellin E; Conte G; Cianconi L
    J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1456-60. PubMed ID: 24139274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
    Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smear Layer Evaluation on Root Canal Preparation with Manual and Rotary Techniques using EDTA as an Irrigant: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Manjunatha M; Annapurna K; Sudhakar V; Sunil Kumar V; Hiremath VK; Shah A
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Feb; 5(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 24155580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of Smear Layer Removal and Penetration Depth of Root Canal Irrigant Using Different Irrigation Activation Systems: A Comparative Study.
    Pujari MD; Das M; Das A; Kamath DG; Henry J; Shyam A; Alhaleis DM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Apr; 25(4):331-334. PubMed ID: 38956847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of three irrigation methods: SWEEPS, ultrasonic, and traditional irrigation, in smear layer and debris removal abilities in the root canal, beyond the fractured instrument.
    Vatanpour M; Toursavadkouhi S; Sajjad S
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Mar; 37():102707. PubMed ID: 34971819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of four different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal in curved root canals : a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Ahuja P; Nandini S; Ballal S; Velmurugan N
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Jan; 11(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 24910670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.