These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37771804)

  • 1. The pragmatics of exhaustivity in embedded questions: an experimental comparison of
    Fricke L; Destruel E; Zimmermann M; Onea E
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1148275. PubMed ID: 37771804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exhaustivity and Anti-Exhaustivity in the RSA Framework: Testing the Effect of Prior Beliefs.
    Cremers A; Wilcox EG; Spector B
    Cogn Sci; 2023 May; 47(5):e13286. PubMed ID: 37170678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are Narrow Focus Exhaustivity Inferences Bayesian Inferences?
    Schreiber A; Onea E
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():677223. PubMed ID: 34421732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associations between focus constructions and levels of exhaustivity: An experimental investigation of Chinese.
    Hsu YY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223502. PubMed ID: 31596888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Acquisition of Exhaustive Pairing in Multiple Wh-Questions in Mandarin.
    de Villiers J; Ning C; Liu XL; Zhang YW; Jiang F
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Dec; 47(6):1369-1389. PubMed ID: 29858756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages?
    Hutzler F; Ziegler JC; Perry C; Wimmer H; Zorzi M
    Cognition; 2004 Apr; 91(3):273-96. PubMed ID: 15168898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judgements about double-embedded relative clauses differ between languages.
    Frank SL; Ernst P
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1581-1593. PubMed ID: 29687232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-linguistic differences in prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in German and English.
    O'Brien MG; Jackson CN; Gardner CE
    Appl Psycholinguist; 2014 Jan; 35(1):27-70. PubMed ID: 24453383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. I know what you're probably going to say: Listener adaptation to variable use of uncertainty expressions.
    Schuster S; Degen J
    Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104285. PubMed ID: 32535344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Readability of English, German, and Russian Disease-Related Wikipedia Pages: Automated Computational Analysis.
    Gordejeva J; Zowalla R; Pobiruchin M; Wiesner M
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 May; 24(5):e36835. PubMed ID: 35576562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-Linguistic Differences in Processing Double-Embedded Relative Clauses: Working-Memory Constraints or Language Statistics?
    Frank SL; Trompenaars T; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):554-78. PubMed ID: 25943302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pragmatic Prediction in the Processing of Referring Expressions Containing Scalar Quantifiers.
    Macuch Silva V; Franke M
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():662050. PubMed ID: 34531781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The dynamics of morphological processing in developing readers: A cross-linguistic masked priming study.
    Beyersmann E; Mousikou P; Schroeder S; Javourey-Drevet L; Ziegler JC; Grainger J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Aug; 208():105140. PubMed ID: 33831608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pragmatics Always Matters: An Expanded Vision of Experimental Pragmatics.
    Gibbs RW; Colston HL
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1619. PubMed ID: 32793043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linking Hypothesis and Number of Response Options Modulate Inferred Scalar Implicature Rate.
    Jasbi M; Waldon B; Degen J
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():189. PubMed ID: 30809167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-linguistic differences in parafoveal semantic and orthographic processing.
    Fernandez LB; Scheepers C; Allen SEM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Nov; 83(8):3183-3200. PubMed ID: 34312796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Sudharsanan N; Favaretti C; Hachaturyan V; Bärnighausen T; Vandormael A
    Trials; 2021 Sep; 22(1):592. PubMed ID: 34488843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.