129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37772290)
1. Comparison of Live and Remote Video Ratings of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia.
Taheri Amin A; Faber J; Önder D; Kimmich O; Synofzik M; Ashizawa T; Klockgether T; Grobe-Einsler M
Mov Disord Clin Pract; 2023 Sep; 10(9):1404-1407. PubMed ID: 37772290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia Is Reliable and Valid in the Telehealth Setting for Patients With Cerebellar Ataxia.
Reoli R; Therrien A; Millar J; Hill N; Varghese R; Roemmich R; Whitall J; Bastian A; Keller J
Phys Ther; 2024 Mar; 104(3):. PubMed ID: 38051602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA): Development of a Training Tool and Certification Program.
Grobe-Einsler M; Amin AT; Faber J; Völkel H; Synofzik M; Klockgether T
Cerebellum; 2024 Jun; 23(3):877-880. PubMed ID: 36922437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reliability of the Japanese version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)].
Sato K; Yabe I; Soma H; Yasui K; Ito M; Shimohata T; Onodera O; Nakashima K; Sobue G; Nishizawa M; Sasaki H
Brain Nerve; 2009 May; 61(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 19514520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and reliability of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in multiple sclerosis patients with ataxia.
Salcı Y; Fil A; Keklicek H; Çetin B; Armutlu K; Dolgun A; Tuncer A; Karabudak R
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2017 Nov; 18():135-140. PubMed ID: 29141795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the clinical meaningfulness of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia: A comparison of patient and physician perspectives at the item level.
Maas RPPWM; van de Warrenburg BPC
Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 2021 Oct; 91():37-41. PubMed ID: 34479057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining the Validity of Conducting Rating Scales in Friedreich Ataxia through Video.
Tai G; Corben LA; Woodcock IR; Yiu EM; Delatycki MB
Mov Disord Clin Pract; 2021 Jul; 8(5):688-693. PubMed ID: 34307740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of SARA
Grobe-Einsler M; Taheri Amin A; Faber J; Schaprian T; Jacobi H; Schmitz-Hübsch T; Diallo A; Tezenas du Montcel S; Klockgether T
Mov Disord; 2021 May; 36(5):1242-1246. PubMed ID: 33433030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefulness of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA).
Yabe I; Matsushima M; Soma H; Basri R; Sasaki H
J Neurol Sci; 2008 Mar; 266(1-2):164-6. PubMed ID: 17950753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Korean version of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia in ataxic stroke patients.
Kim BR; Lee JY; Kim MJ; Jung H; Lee J
Ann Rehabil Med; 2014 Dec; 38(6):742-51. PubMed ID: 25566472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: Age-dependent performance of healthy adults.
Grobe-Einsler M; Schmidt A; Schaprian T; Vogt IR; Klockgether T
Eur J Neurol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):548-551. PubMed ID: 36214603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical features and outcome of patients with autoimmune cerebellar ataxia evaluated with the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia.
Damato V; Papi C; Spagni G; Evoli A; Silvestri G; Masi G; Sabatelli E; Campetella L; McKeon A; Andreetta F; Riso V; Monte G; Luigetti M; Primiano G; Calabresi P; Iorio R
Eur J Neurol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):564-572. PubMed ID: 34710286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia.
Tan S; Niu HX; Zhao L; Gao Y; Lu JM; Shi CH; Avinash C; Wang RH; Xu YM
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013; 126(11):2045-8. PubMed ID: 23769555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in Ataxic Stroke Patients.
Kim BR; Lim JH; Lee SA; Park S; Koh SE; Lee IS; Jung H; Lee J
Ann Rehabil Med; 2011 Dec; 35(6):772-80. PubMed ID: 22506205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of three clinical rating scales in Friedreich ataxia (FRDA).
Bürk K; Mälzig U; Wolf S; Heck S; Dimitriadis K; Schmitz-Hübsch T; Hering S; Lindig TM; Haug V; Timmann D; Degen I; Kruse B; Dörr JM; Ratzka S; Ivo A; Schöls L; Boesch S; Klockgether T; Klopstock T; Schulz JB
Mov Disord; 2009 Sep; 24(12):1779-84. PubMed ID: 19562766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patterns of motor signs in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 at the start of follow-up in a reference unit.
Pulido-Valdeolivas I; Gómez-Andrés D; Sanz-Gallego I; Rausell E; Arpa J
Cerebellum Ataxias; 2016; 3():4. PubMed ID: 26909158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applicability of quantitative oculomotor and SARA assessment in children.
Vogelaar FA; Brandsma R; Maurits NM; Sival DA
Eur J Paediatr Neurol; 2021 Nov; 35():56-60. PubMed ID: 34610562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of a Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in Friedreich's ataxia patients according to posturography is limited.
Schwabova J; Maly T; Laczo J; Zumrova A; Komarek V; Musova Z; Zahalka F
J Neurol Sci; 2014 Jun; 341(1-2):64-7. PubMed ID: 24768059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal Dynamics of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia in Spinocerebellar Ataxias.
Moulaire P; Poulet PE; Petit E; Klockgether T; Durr A; Ashisawa T; Tezenas du Montcel S;
Mov Disord; 2023 Jan; 38(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 36273394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Item performance of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia in rare and ultra-rare genetic ataxias.
Hamdan A; Hooker AC; Chen X; Traschütz A; Schüle R; ; ; Synofzik M; Karlsson MO
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38769902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
