129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37773556)
1. Incidental parasympathetic cardiac denervation during atrial fibrillation ablation using high power short duration: a marker of long-term success.
Vassallo F; Corcino L; Cunha C; Serpa E; Lovatto C; Simoes A; Carloni H; Hespanhol D; Gasparini D; Barbosa LF; Schmidt A
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37773556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of outcomes with low-power long duration versus high-power short duration of ablation: the role of the acute change in sinus rhythm after the ablation as a predictor of long-term success.
Vassallo F; Meigre LL; Cunha C; Serpa E; Simoes A; Lovatto C; Gasparini D; Corcino L; Schmidt A
Heart Vessels; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1749-1756. PubMed ID: 35430635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduced esophageal heating in high-power short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation in the contact force catheter era.
Vassallo F; Meigre LL; Serpa E; Cunha CL; Carloni H; Simoes A; Amaral D; Lovatto C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Jul; 44(7):1185-1192. PubMed ID: 34081339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acute oesophageal safety and long-term follow-up of AI-guided high-power short-duration with 50 W for atrial fibrillation ablation.
Müller J; Nentwich K; Berkovitz A; Ene E; Sonne K; Zhuravlev V; Chakarov I; Barth S; Waechter C; Behnes M; Halbfass P; Deneke T
Europace; 2023 Apr; 25(4):1379-1391. PubMed ID: 36881791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of lesion characteristics between conventional and high-power short-duration ablation using contact force-sensing catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Chen CC; Lee PT; Van Ba V; Chuang CM; Lin YJ; Lo LW; Hu YF; Chung FP; Lin CY; Chang TY; Vicera JJ; Huang TC; Liu CM; Wu CI; Lugtu IC; Jain A; Chang SL; Chen SA
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Aug; 21(1):387. PubMed ID: 34372779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablations using contact force sensing catheters: Outcomes and predictors of success including posterior wall isolation.
Winkle RA; Mead RH; Engel G; Kong MH; Salcedo J; Brodt CR; Patrawala RA
Heart Rhythm; 2020 Aug; 17(8):1223-1231. PubMed ID: 32272229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation using a contact force-sensing catheter and conventional technique: Initial results.
Vassallo F; Cunha C; Serpa E; Meigre LL; Carloni H; Simoes A; Hespanhol D; Lovatto CV; Batista W; Serpa R
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1877-1883. PubMed ID: 31397522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between weight-adjusted, high-frequency, low-tidal-volume ventilation and atrial pacing with normal ventilation in high-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation: Results of a pilot study.
Vassallo F; Cancellieri JP; Cunha C; Corcino L; Serpa E; Simoes A; Hespanhol D; Volponi C; Gasparini D; Schmidt A
Heart Rhythm O2; 2023 Aug; 4(8):483-490. PubMed ID: 37645264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct comparison of two 50 W high power short duration approaches-Temperature- versus ablation index-guided radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Guckel D; Bergau L; Braun M; El Hamriti M; Mörsdorf M; Fink T; Sciacca V; Khalaph M; Imnadze G; Sommer P; Sohns C
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Dec; 33(12):2517-2527. PubMed ID: 36104929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes and impacts in early recurrences after atrial fibrillation ablation in contact force era: comparison of high-power short-duration with conventional technique-FIRST experience data.
Vassallo F; Meigre LL; Serpa E; Cunha C; Simoes A; Carloni H; Amaral D; Meira K; Pezzin F
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Nov; 62(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 33151444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of clinical and procedural outcomes between high-power short-duration, standard-power standard-duration, and temperature-controlled noncontact force guided ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Dikdan SJ; Junarta J; Bodempudi S; Upadhyay N; Pang Z; Frisch DR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 33415782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety of high-power short duration atrial fibrillation ablation in elderly patients.
Müller J; Nentwich K; Berkovitz A; Ene E; Sonne K; Chakarov I; Barth S; Waechter C; Lüsebrink U; Behnes M; Akin I; Deneke T
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 35441414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation.
Junarta J; Dikdan SJ; Upadhyay N; Bodempudi S; Shvili MY; Frisch DR
Heart Vessels; 2022 Jun; 37(6):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 34846561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation compared with a conventional approach: Outcomes and reconnection patterns.
Hansom SP; Alqarawi W; Birnie DH; Golian M; Nery PB; Redpath CJ; Klein A; Green MS; Davis DR; Sheppard-Perkins E; Ramirez FD; Nair GM; Sadek MM
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 May; 32(5):1219-1228. PubMed ID: 33751694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety aspects of very high power very short duration atrial fibrillation ablation using a modified radiofrequency RF-generator: Single-center experience.
Mueller J; Halbfass P; Sonne K; Nentwich K; Ene E; Berkovitz A; Lehmkuhl L; Barth S; Simu GR; Waechter C; Behnes M; Deneke T
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 May; 33(5):920-927. PubMed ID: 35233883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical superior vena cava isolation in patients undergoing repeat catheter ablation procedure after recurrence of atrial fibrillation.
Simu G; Deneke T; Ene E; Nentwich K; Berkovitz A; Sonne K; Halbfass P; Arvaniti E; Waechter C; Müller J
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2022 Nov; 65(2):551-558. PubMed ID: 35857220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: atrial fibrillation type determines the success rate.
Derejko P; Polańska M; Chojnowska L; Michałowska I; Wójcik A; Piotrowicz E; Lech A; Kłopotowski M; Baranowski R; Przybylski A; Bilińska M; Sierpiński R; Walczak F; Szumowski L
Kardiol Pol; 2013; 71(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 23348529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcome of lesion size index-guided high-power radiofrequency catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2-year follow-up.
Cai C; Wang J; Niu HX; Chu JM; Hua W; Zhang S; Yao Y
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Mar; 34(3):546-555. PubMed ID: 36640429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and outcome of very high-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Kottmaier M; Popa M; Bourier F; Reents T; Cifuentes J; Semmler V; Telishevska M; Otgonbayar U; Koch-Büttner K; Lennerz C; Bartkowiak M; Kornmayer M; Rousseva E; Brkic A; Grebmer C; Kolb C; Hessling G; Deisenhofer I
Europace; 2020 Mar; 22(3):388-393. PubMed ID: 31872249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ravi V; Poudyal A; Abid QU; Larsen T; Krishnan K; Sharma PS; Trohman RG; Huang HD
Europace; 2021 May; 23(5):710-721. PubMed ID: 33523184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
