147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37773806)
21. Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning.
Wang X; Yang W; Weinreb J; Han J; Li Q; Kong X; Yan Y; Ke Z; Luo B; Liu T; Wang L
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15415. PubMed ID: 29133818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Machine learning-based analysis of MR radiomics can help to improve the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 in clinically relevant prostate cancer.
Wang J; Wu CJ; Bao ML; Zhang J; Wang XN; Zhang YD
Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4082-4090. PubMed ID: 28374077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Amide Proton Transfer Could Provide More Accurate Lesion Characterization in the Transition Zone of the Prostate.
Guo Z; Qin X; Mu R; Lv J; Meng Z; Zheng W; Zhuang Z; Zhu X
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Nov; 56(5):1311-1319. PubMed ID: 35429190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Machine learning-based MRI texture analysis to predict occult lymph node metastasis in early-stage oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.
Yuan Y; Ren J; Tao X
Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6429-6437. PubMed ID: 33569617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models.
Liu H; Tang K; Peng E; Wang L; Xia D; Chen Z
Cancer Manag Res; 2020; 12():13099-13110. PubMed ID: 33376402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A radiomics method based on MR FS-T2WI sequence for diagnosing of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease progression.
Cong L; Hua QQ; Huang ZQ; Ma QL; Wang XM; Huang CC; Xu JX; Ma T
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2021 Sep; 25(18):5769-5780. PubMed ID: 34604968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Machine learning for the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on MRI: a meta-analysis.
Cuocolo R; Cipullo MB; Stanzione A; Romeo V; Green R; Cantoni V; Ponsiglione A; Ugga L; Imbriaco M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6877-6887. PubMed ID: 32607629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Automated multiparametric localization of prostate cancer based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics.
Wildeboer RR; Mannaerts CK; van Sloun RJG; Budäus L; Tilki D; Wijkstra H; Salomon G; Mischi M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):806-815. PubMed ID: 31602512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Preoperative classification of primary and metastatic liver cancer via machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics.
Mao B; Ma J; Duan S; Xia Y; Tao Y; Zhang L
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4576-4586. PubMed ID: 33447862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prostate Cancer Risk Prediction and Online Calculation Based on Machine Learning Algorithm.
Wang C; Chang QX; Wang XM; Wang KY; Wang H; Cui Z; Li CP
Chin Med Sci J; 2022 Sep; 37(3):210-217. PubMed ID: 36321176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. T1 Mapping of the Prostate Using Single-Shot T1FLASH: A Clinical Feasibility Study to Optimize Prostate Cancer Assessment.
Al-Bourini O; Seif Amir Hosseini A; Giganti F; Balz J; Heitz LG; Voit D; Lotz J; Trojan L; Frahm J; Uhlig A; Uhlig J
Invest Radiol; 2023 Jun; 58(6):380-387. PubMed ID: 36729865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Predicting the Grade of Prostate Cancer Based on a Biparametric MRI Radiomics Signature.
Zhang L; Zhe X; Tang M; Zhang J; Ren J; Zhang X; Li L
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2021; 2021():7830909. PubMed ID: 35024015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Machine learning-based prediction of invisible intraprostatic prostate cancer lesions on
Yi Z; Hu S; Lin X; Zou Q; Zou M; Zhang Z; Xu L; Jiang N; Zhang Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Apr; 49(5):1523-1534. PubMed ID: 34845536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Machine Learning in the Differentiation of Soft Tissue Neoplasms: Comparison of Fat-Suppressed T2WI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Features-Based Models.
Hu P; Chen L; Zhou Z
J Digit Imaging; 2021 Oct; 34(5):1146-1155. PubMed ID: 34545474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prostate cancer detection using machine learning techniques by employing combination of features extracting strategies.
Hussain L; Ahmed A; Saeed S; Rathore S; Awan IA; Shah SA; Majid A; Idris A; Awan AA
Cancer Biomark; 2018 Feb; 21(2):393-413. PubMed ID: 29226857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Machine learning prediction of prostate cancer from transrectal ultrasound video clips.
Wang K; Chen P; Feng B; Tu J; Hu Z; Zhang M; Yang J; Zhan Y; Yao J; Xu D
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():948662. PubMed ID: 36091110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Deep feature classification of angiomyolipoma without visible fat and renal cell carcinoma in abdominal contrast-enhanced CT images with texture image patches and hand-crafted feature concatenation.
Lee H; Hong H; Kim J; Jung DC
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1550-1561. PubMed ID: 29474742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radiogenomics of lower-grade gliomas: machine learning-based MRI texture analysis for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status.
Kocak B; Durmaz ES; Ates E; Sel I; Turgut Gunes S; Kaya OK; Zeynalova A; Kilickesmez O
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):877-886. PubMed ID: 31691122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Machine learning approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from radical prostatectomies.
Gertych A; Ing N; Ma Z; Fuchs TJ; Salman S; Mohanty S; Bhele S; Velásquez-Vacca A; Amin MB; Knudsen BS
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2(Pt 2):197-208. PubMed ID: 26362074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
