These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37774499)

  • 1. Comparison of GUMMETAL® and stainless steel alloy during canine retraction: A pilot split-mouth randomized controlled trial.
    Ravlyk L; Warunek S; Covell D; Tanberg W; Al-Jewair T
    Int Orthod; 2023 Dec; 21(4):100810. PubMed ID: 37774499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Friction forces generated by aesthetic Gummetal® (Ti-Nb) orthodontic archwires: A comparative in vitro study.
    Albawardi A; Warunek S; Makowka S; Al-Jewair T
    Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100683. PubMed ID: 35995715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Using Self-ligating Brackets on Maxillary Canine Retraction: A Split-mouth Design Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hassan SE; Hajeer MY; Alali OH; Kaddah AS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jun; 17(6):496-503. PubMed ID: 27484605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
    Yee JA; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Cheng LL; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of space closure rates between preactivated nickel-titanium and titanium-molybdenum alloy T-loops: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Keng FY; Quick AN; Swain MV; Herbison P
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 21415288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nickel titanium springs versus stainless steel springs: A randomized clinical trial of two methods of space closure.
    Norman NH; Worthington H; Chadwick SM
    J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 43(3):176-85. PubMed ID: 26836747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.
    Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anchorage loss during canine retraction using intermittent versus continuous force distractions; a split mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Mowafy MI; Zaher AR
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 23021114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the orthodontic load systems created with elastomeric power chain to close extraction spaces on different rectangular archwires.
    Kroczek C; Kula K; Stewart K; Baldwin J; Fu T; Chen J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):262-268. PubMed ID: 22381486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of elastic memory chains versus nickel-titanium coil springs in canine retraction: A two-center split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Khanemasjedi M; Moradinejad M; Javidi P; Niknam O; Jahromi NH; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):561-574. PubMed ID: 29153282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of ion implantation of TMA archwires on the rate of orthodontic sliding space closure.
    Kula K; Phillips C; Gibilaro A; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Nov; 114(5):577-80. PubMed ID: 9810054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a continuous edgewise arch wire.
    Garner LD; Allai WW; Moore BK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Sep; 90(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 3463195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of canine retraction and anchorage loss in different facial types with and without piezocision: a split-mouth-design, randomized clinical trial.
    Al-A'athal HS; Al-Nimri K; Alhammadi MS
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Nov; 92(6):746-754. PubMed ID: 35852456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains.
    Bokas J; Woods M
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16792244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthodontic space closure in sliding mechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sebastian B; Bhuvaraghan A; Thiruvenkatachari B
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):210-225. PubMed ID: 34609513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific evidence for pre-adjusted edgewise mechanics.
    Mandall NA; Malik O
    Dent Update; 2007; 34(1):45-6, 48, 50-1. PubMed ID: 17348558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized clinical trial investigating pain associated with superelastic nickel-titanium and multistranded stainless steel archwires during the initial leveling and aligning phase of orthodontic treatment.
    Sandhu SS; Sandhu J
    J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 40(4):276-85. PubMed ID: 24297959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison between friction and frictionless mechanics with a new typodont simulation system.
    Rhee JN; Chun YS; Row J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 11244423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.