These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37775484)

  • 21. Predictors of Fibrotic and Bone Tissue Formation With 3-D Reconstructions of Post-implantation Human Temporal Bones.
    Danielian A; Ishiyama G; Lopez IA; Ishiyama A
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Aug; 42(7):e942-e948. PubMed ID: 33710156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The nucleus double array cochlear implant: a new concept for the obliterated cochlea.
    Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Weber BP; Issing PR; Frohne C; Büchner A; Battmer RD; Parker J; von Wallenberg E
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Jan; 22(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11314711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal changes in impedance of implanted adults for various cochlear segments.
    Leone CA; Mosca F; Grassia R
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2017 Aug; 37(4):312-319. PubMed ID: 28872161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Impact of a Cochlear Implant Electrode Array on the Middle Ear Transfer Function.
    Pazen D; Anagiotos A; Nünning M; Gostian AO; Ortmann M; Beutner D
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e241-e255. PubMed ID: 28207578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
    Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surgical approach to the facial recess influences the acceptable trajectory of cochlear implantation electrodes.
    Copson B; Wijewickrema S; Ma X; Zhou Y; Gerard JM; O'Leary S
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jan; 279(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 33547488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impedance, neural response telemetry, and speech perception outcomes after reimplantation of cochlear implants in children.
    Birman CS; Sanli H; Gibson WP; Elliott EJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1385-93. PubMed ID: 24662639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Round Window Insertion in Veria Technique of Cochlear Implantation: An Essential Modification.
    Bhavana K; Bharti B; Vishwakarma R
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 71(Suppl 2):1586-1591. PubMed ID: 31750221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cochlear implantation outcomes with round window electrode insertion versus cochleostomy insertion.
    Elafandi H; Khalifa MA; Elguindy AS
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 138():110272. PubMed ID: 32798831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The significance of microanatomy of the round window in terms of cochlear implantation].
    Kostevich IV; Kuzovkov VE; Lilenko AS; Sugarova SB
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2021; 86(5):42-47. PubMed ID: 34783472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multicenter surgical experience evaluation on the Mid-Scala electrode and insertion tools.
    Gazibegovic D; Bero EM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 274(2):1147-1151. PubMed ID: 27515706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Novel Impedance Measures as Biomarker for Intracochlear Fibrosis.
    Leblans M; Sismono F; Vanpoucke F; van Dinther J; Lerut B; Kuhweide R; Offeciers E; Zarowski A
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108563. PubMed ID: 35794046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected?
    Dietz A; Wennström M; Lehtimäki A; Löppönen H; Valtonen H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 26164294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of round window vs cochleostomy surgical approaches on interscalar excursions in the cochlea: Preliminary results from a flat-panel computed tomography study.
    Jiam NT; Limb CJ
    World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 2(3):142-147. PubMed ID: 29204559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A novel perfusion-based method for cochlear implant electrode insertion.
    Kale S; Cervantes VM; Wu MR; Pisano DV; Sheth N; Olson ES
    Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 314():33-41. PubMed ID: 24882641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of electrode impedance and its subcomponents for lateral wall, mid-scala, and perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implants.
    Saoji AA; Graham M; Stein A; Koka K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 34895078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intraoperative Impedance-Based Estimation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion Depth.
    Aebischer P; Meyer S; Caversaccio M; Wimmer W
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Feb; 68(2):545-555. PubMed ID: 32746052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. To Use the Back-up Cochlear Implant or Not? Using Intra-operative Impedance to Guide Your Decisions.
    Mehta N; Chu P; Birman CS
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Apr; 43(4):e408-e413. PubMed ID: 35239618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.