BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37776336)

  • 1. Patient-related characteristics predict prostate cancers in men with PI-RADS 4-5 to further optimize the diagnostic performance of MRI.
    Xiang L; Ma S; Xu Y; Jiang L; Guo H; Liu H; Liu Y
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Dec; 48(12):3766-3773. PubMed ID: 37776336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
    Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining clinical parameters and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to stratify biopsy-naïve men for an optimum diagnostic strategy with prostate-specific antigen 4 ng ml
    Zhang CC; Tu X; Lin TH; Cai DM; Yang L; Qiu S; Liu ZH; Yang L; Wei Q
    Asian J Androl; 2023; 25(4):492-498. PubMed ID: 36571328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
    Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PSA density is complementary to prostate MP-MRI PI-RADS scoring system for risk stratification of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Frisbie JW; Van Besien AJ; Lee A; Xu L; Wang S; Choksi A; Afzal MA; Naslund MJ; Lane B; Wong J; Wnorowski A; Siddiqui MM
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Jun; 26(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 35523940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Role of PSA Density among PI-RADS v2.1 Categories to Avoid an Unnecessary Transition Zone Biopsy in Patients with PSA 4-20 ng/mL.
    Wang ZB; Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Dai GC; Tu J; Shen JK
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():3995789. PubMed ID: 34671673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive clinical features for negative histopathology of MRI/Ultrasound-fusion-guided prostate biopsy in patients with high likelihood of cancer at prostate MRI: Analysis from a urologic outpatient clinic1.
    Apfelbeck M; Pfitzinger P; Bischoff R; Rath L; Buchner A; Mumm JN; Schlenker B; Stief CG; Chaloupka M; Clevert DA
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 76(4):503-511. PubMed ID: 33337358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate imaging-reporting and data system version 2 in combination with clinical parameters for prostate cancer detection: a single center experience.
    Wang L; Luo Y; Liu T; Deng M; Huang X
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2023 Jul; 55(7):1659-1664. PubMed ID: 37171702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinico-radiological characteristic-based machine learning in reducing unnecessary prostate biopsies of PI-RADS 3 lesions with dual validation.
    Kan Y; Zhang Q; Hao J; Wang W; Zhuang J; Gao J; Huang H; Liang J; Marra G; Calleris G; Oderda M; Zhao X; Gontero P; Guo H
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6274-6284. PubMed ID: 32524222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Wei X; Xu J; Zhong S; Zou J; Cheng Z; Ding Z; Zhou X
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Oct; 47(10):3574-3582. PubMed ID: 35788882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining Prostate Health Index density, magnetic resonance imaging and prior negative biopsy status to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Druskin SC; Tosoian JJ; Young A; Collica S; Srivastava A; Ghabili K; Macura KJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Sokoll LJ; Ross AE; Pavlovich CP
    BJU Int; 2018 Apr; 121(4):619-626. PubMed ID: 29232037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilizing lesion diameter and prostate specific antigen density to decide on magnetic resonance imaging guided confirmatory biopsy of prostate imaging reporting and data system score three lesions in African American prostate cancer patients managed with active surveillance.
    Alanee S; Deebajah M; Dabaja A; Peabody J; Menon M
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Apr; 54(4):799-803. PubMed ID: 35138582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?
    Polanec SH; Bickel H; Wengert GJ; Arnoldner M; Clauser P; Susani M; Shariat SF; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e1-157.e7. PubMed ID: 31690449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PI-RADS v2.1 and PSAD for the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer among patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml.
    Wen J; Liu W; Shen X; Hu W
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6570. PubMed ID: 38503972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
    Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biparametric prostate MRI and clinical indicators predict clinically significant prostate cancer in men with "gray zone" PSA levels.
    Wei CG; Chen T; Zhang YY; Pan P; Dai GC; Yu HC; Yang S; Jiang Z; Tu J; Lu ZH; Shen JK; Zhao WL
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():108977. PubMed ID: 32330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    Yang J; Li J; Xiao L; Zhou M; Fang Z; Cai Y; Tang Y; Hu S
    Cancer Imaging; 2023 Sep; 23(1):81. PubMed ID: 37667341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of false-positive PI-RADS 5 lesions on prostate multiparametric MRI: development and internal validation of a clinical-radiological characteristics based nomogram.
    Cheng Y; Fan B; Fu Y; Yin H; Lu J; Li D; Li X; Qiu X; Guo H
    BMC Urol; 2024 Apr; 24(1):76. PubMed ID: 38566091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
    Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.