159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37776336)
21. Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone.
Niu XK; Li J; Das SK; Xiong Y; Yang CB; Peng T
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 28143433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Using the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RIDS v2) to detect prostate cancer can prevent unnecessary biopsies and invasive treatment.
Liu C; Liu SL; Wang ZX; Yu K; Feng CX; Ke Z; Wang L; Zeng XY
Asian J Androl; 2018; 20(5):459-464. PubMed ID: 29667616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region.
Zhou Z; Liang Z; Zuo Y; Zhou Y; Yan W; Wu X; Ji Z; Li H; Hu M; Ma L
Prostate; 2022 Apr; 82(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 35098557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Unified model involving genomics, magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density outperforms individual co-variables at predicting biopsy upgrading in patients on active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.
Beksac AT; Ratnani P; Dovey Z; Parekh S; Falagario U; Roshandel R; Sobotka S; Kewlani D; Davis A; Weil R; Bashorun H; Jambor I; Lewis S; Haines K; Tewari AK
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 Mar; 5(3):e1492. PubMed ID: 34931468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer.
Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. PI-RADS 3 lesions: Does the association of the lesion volume with the prostate-specific antigen density matter in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer?
Rico L; Blas L; Vitagliano G; Contreras P; Rios Pita H; Ameri C
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):431.e9-431.e13. PubMed ID: 33221259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate-specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Multicenter Evaluation.
Chiu PK; Leow JJ; Chiang CH; Mok A; Zhang K; Hsieh PF; Zhu Y; Lam W; Tsang WC; Fan YH; Lin TP; Chan TY; Leung CH; Teoh JY; Chu PS; Zhu G; Ye DW; Wu HC; Tan TW; Tsu JH; Ng CF; Chiong E; Huang CY
J Urol; 2023 Jul; 210(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 37036248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: further outcome and consequences.
Haack M; Miksch V; Tian Z; Duwe G; Thomas A; Borkowetz A; Stroh K; Thomas C; Haferkamp A; Höfner T; Boehm K
World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):2947-2954. PubMed ID: 36318314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The potential of a nomogram combined PI-RADS v2.1 and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to reduce unnecessary biopsies in prostate cancer diagnostics.
Liu Y; Wang S; Xiang LH; Xu G; Dong L; Sun Y; Ye B; Zhang Y; Xu H
Br J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 95(1138):20220209. PubMed ID: 35877385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Which men with non-malignant pathology at magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy and persistent PI-RADS 3-5 lesions should repeat biopsy?
Castellani D; Pace G; Cecchini S; Franzese C; Cicconofri A; Romagnoli D; Del Rosso A; Possanzini M; Paci E; Dellabella M; Pierangeli T
Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):452.e9-452.e16. PubMed ID: 35871992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The use of 29 MHz transrectal micro-ultrasound to stratify the prostate cancer risk in patients with PI-RADS III lesions at multiparametric MRI: A single institutional analysis.
Avolio PP; Lughezzani G; Paciotti M; Maffei D; Uleri A; Frego N; Hurle R; Lazzeri M; Saita A; Guazzoni G; Casale P; Buffi NM
Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):832.e1-832.e7. PubMed ID: 34183255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of prostate-specific antigen density and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer for biopsy-naïve men: clinical outcomes from a high-volume center in China.
Zhang CC; Tu X; Lin TH; Cai DM; Yang L; Nie L; Qiu S; Liu ZH; Jin K; Li JK; Xiong XY; Yang L; Wei Q
Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(6):615-619. PubMed ID: 35532555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prostate-specific Antigen Parameters and Prostate Health Index Enhance Prostate Cancer Prediction With the In-bore 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy After Negative 12-Core Biopsy.
Friedl A; Stangl K; Bauer W; Kivaranovic D; Schneeweiss J; Susani M; Hruby S; Lusuardi L; Lomoschitz F; Eisenhuber-Stadler E; Schima W; Brössner C
Urology; 2017 Dec; 110():148-153. PubMed ID: 28844600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimal PSA density threshold and predictive factors for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in patient with a PI-RADS 3 lesion on MRI.
Nguyen TA; Fourcade A; Zambon A; Saout K; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Tissot V; Doucet L; Rozet F; Fournier G; Valeri A
Urol Oncol; 2023 Aug; 41(8):354.e11-354.e18. PubMed ID: 37391283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Is possible to rule out clinically significant prostate cancer using PI-RADS v2 for the assessment of prostate MRI?
Viana PCC; Horvat N; do Santos VR; Lima TC; Romão DDS; Cerri LMO; de Castro MG; Vargas HA; Miranda JA; Leite CDC; Cerri GG
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):724-731. PubMed ID: 31136114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy.
Deniffel D; Perlis N; Ghai S; Girgis S; Healy GM; Fleshner N; Hamilton R; Kulkarni G; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7544-7554. PubMed ID: 35507051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low cancer yield in PI-RADS 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization?
Messina E; Pecoraro M; Laschena L; Bicchetti M; Proietti F; Ciardi A; Leonardo C; Sciarra A; Girometti R; Catalano C; Panebianco V
Eur Radiol; 2023 Aug; 33(8):5828-5839. PubMed ID: 37045981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. PI-RADS score v.2 in predicting malignancy in patients undergoing 5α-reductase inhibitor therapy.
Forte V; Cavallo AU; Bertolo R; de Soccio V; Sperandio M; Bove P; Ciccariello M
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Mar; 24(1):150-155. PubMed ID: 32681155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical utility of PSAD combined with PI-RADS category for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Stevens E; Truong M; Bullen JA; Ward RD; Purysko AS; Klein EA
Urol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 38(11):846.e9-846.e16. PubMed ID: 32576527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
