145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37776384)
1. Evaluation of the thickness of coronary calcium by 60-MHz intravascular ultrasound: head-to-head comparison with optical frequency domain imaging.
Oshikiri Y; Ishida M; Sakamoto R; Kimura T; Shimoda Y; Koeda Y; Shimada R; Itoh T; Morino Y
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Dec; 39(12):2599-2607. PubMed ID: 37776384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison Between Optical Frequency Domain Imaging and Intravascular Ultrasound for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance in Biolimus A9-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized MISTIC-1 Non-Inferiority Trial.
Muramatsu T; Ozaki Y; Nanasato M; Ishikawa M; Nagasaka R; Ohota M; Hashimoto Y; Yoshiki Y; Takatsu H; Ito K; Kamiya H; Yoshida Y; Murohara T; Izawa H;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e009314. PubMed ID: 33106049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Additive Value of Integrated Backscatter IVUS for Detection of Vulnerable Plaque by Optical Frequency Domain Imaging: An Ex Vivo Autopsy Study of Human Coronary Arteries.
Nakano M; Yahagi K; Yamamoto H; Taniwaki M; Otsuka F; Ladich ER; Joner M; Virmani R
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Feb; 9(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 26777223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optical Frequency Domain Imaging Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OPINION Trial): Results From the OPINION Imaging Study.
Otake H; Kubo T; Takahashi H; Shinke T; Okamura T; Hibi K; Nakazawa G; Morino Y; Shite J; Fusazaki T; Kozuma K; Ioji T; Kaneda H; Akasaka T;
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 11(1):111-123. PubMed ID: 28917678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of coronary arterial calcification - Ex-vivo assessment by optical frequency domain imaging.
Ijichi T; Nakazawa G; Torii S; Nakano M; Yoshikawa A; Morino Y; Ikari Y
Atherosclerosis; 2015 Nov; 243(1):242-7. PubMed ID: 26408928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
Wang X; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Lee T; Zhang W; Cao Y; Fujino A; Lin Y; Usui E; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Maehara A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative precision of optical frequency domain imaging: direct comparison with frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
Kobayashi Y; Kitahara H; Tanaka S; Okada K; Kimura T; Ikeno F; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Apr; 31(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 26271203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First-in-man evaluation of intravascular optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) of Terumo: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography.
Okamura T; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; van Geuns RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Schultz C; van der Giessen WJ; Ligthart J; Regar E; Serruys PW
EuroIntervention; 2011 Apr; 6(9):1037-45. PubMed ID: 21518674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of coronary artery remodelling by dual-source CT: a head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Gauss S; Achenbach S; Pflederer T; Schuhbäck A; Daniel WG; Marwan M
Heart; 2011 Jun; 97(12):991-7. PubMed ID: 21478387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multimodality imaging of attenuated plaque using grayscale and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and optical coherent tomography.
Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Han S; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 88(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 25511369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors determining the frequency of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound use in patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions in recent years: Analysis based on a large national registry.
Januszek R; Siudak Z; Malinowski KP; Wańha W; Surowiec S; Heba G; Pawlik A; Kameczura T; Wojakowski W; Jaguszewski M; Kołodziej A; Bryniarski L; Bartuś K; Surdacki A; Dobrzycki S; Legutko J; Bartuś S
Kardiol Pol; 2023; 81(10):969-977. PubMed ID: 37401576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver Variability Between Expert, Experienced, and Novice Operator Affects Interpretation of Optical Coherence Tomography and 20 MHz Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging.
Martin WG; McNaughton E; Bambrough PB; West NEJ; Hoole SP
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Feb; 47():33-39. PubMed ID: 36207273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Kubo T; Shinke T; Okamura T; Hibi K; Nakazawa G; Morino Y; Shite J; Fusazaki T; Otake H; Kozuma K; Akasaka T
J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 68(5):455-460. PubMed ID: 26763605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-definition intravascular ultrasound versus optical frequency domain imaging for the detection of calcium modification and fracture in heavily calcified coronary lesion.
Ishida M; Oshikiri Y; Kimura T; Sakamoto R; Shimoda Y; Ishikawa Y; Koeda Y; Taguchi Y; Itoh T; Morino Y
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jun; 38(6):1203-1212. PubMed ID: 34988783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optical coherence tomography, intravascular ultrasound or angiography guidance for distal left main coronary stenting. The ROCK cohort II study.
Cortese B; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Lanocha M; Ielasi A; Giannini F; Campo G; D'Ascenzo F; Latini RA; Krestianinov O; Alfonso F; Trani C; Prati F; Linares JA; Sardella G; Wlodarczak A; Viganò E; Camarero TG; Stella P; Sozykin A; Fineschi M; Burzotta F
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):664-673. PubMed ID: 34582631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histopathological validation of optical frequency domain imaging to quantify various types of coronary calcifications.
Saita T; Fujii K; Hao H; Imanaka T; Shibuya M; Fukunaga M; Miki K; Tamaru H; Horimatsu T; Nishimura M; Sumiyoshi A; Kawakami R; Naito Y; Kajimoto N; Hirota S; Masuyama T
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Mar; 18(3):342-349. PubMed ID: 27076364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Associations of coronary plaque characteristics by integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound with detectability of vessel external elastic lamina using optical frequency domain imaging in human coronary arteries: A sub-analysis of the MISTIC-1 trial.
Ishikawa M; Muramatsu T; Nanasato M; Nagasaka R; Takatsu H; Yoshiki Y; Hashimoto Y; Ohota M; Okumura M; Naruse H; Ishii J; Ito K; Takahashi H; Kamiya H; Yoshida Y; Ozaki Y
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Dec; 94(7):947-955. PubMed ID: 31025511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
