These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37777548)

  • 1. Mixed reality drills of indoor earthquake safety considering seismic damage of nonstructural components.
    Xu Z; Yang Y; Zhu Y; Fan J
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):16461. PubMed ID: 37777548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Earthquake Damage Visualization (EDV) Technique for the Rapid Detection of Earthquake-Induced Damages Using SAR Data.
    Sharma RC; Tateishi R; Hara K; Nguyen HT; Gharechelou S; Nguyen LV
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jan; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 28134796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the Performance and Stability of the Highway Subgrades in Seismic Events, a Case Study of the Changning Earthquake, Sichuan.
    Cui Z; Zhang M; Wu K; Ma H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 36361260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Slice-Guided Components Detection and Spatial Semantics Acquisition of Indoor Point Clouds.
    Wang L; Wang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Earthquake Safety Training through Virtual Drills.
    Li C; Liang W; Quigley C; Zhao Y; Yu LF
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2017 Apr; 23(4):1275-1284. PubMed ID: 28129163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation method on seismic risk of substation in strong earthquake area.
    Cui J; Che A; Li S; Cheng Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0258792. PubMed ID: 34855758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post-Earthquake Building Evaluation Using UAVs: A BIM-Based Digital Twin Framework.
    Levine NM; Spencer BF
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mexico City during and after the September 19, 2017 earthquake: Assessment of seismic resilience and ongoing recovery process.
    Tena-Colunga A; Hernández-Ramírez H; Godínez-Domínguez EA; Pérez-Rocha LE
    J Civ Struct Health Monit; 2021; 11(5):1275-1299. PubMed ID: 34367862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Earthquake loss estimation of residential buildings in Bantul regency, Indonesia.
    Aulady MFN; Fujimi T
    Jamba; 2019; 11(1):756. PubMed ID: 31308882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of Mobile Signaling Data in Determining the Seismic Influence Field: A Case Study of the 2017 Mw 6.5 Jiuzhaigou Earthquake, China.
    Guo X; Wei B; Nie G; Su G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(17):. PubMed ID: 36078413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic stability analysis method of anchored rocky slope considering seismic deterioration effect.
    Jia J; Gao X; Bao X; Xiang X; Zhang L; Tu B
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):7014. PubMed ID: 38528051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 2010 Maule earthquake slip correlates with pre-seismic locking of Andean subduction zone.
    Moreno M; Rosenau M; Oncken O
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7312):198-202. PubMed ID: 20829792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seismic vulnerability assessment to earthquake at urban scale: A case of Mostaganem city in Algeria.
    Chaibedra B; Benanane A; Boutaraa Z
    Jamba; 2018; 10(1):473. PubMed ID: 29955262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-Earthquake Strengthening of RC Coupling Beams with GFRP Wrapping: Experimental Investigation.
    Eser N; Töre E; Bal İE
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Sep; 16(17):. PubMed ID: 37687733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial and temporal seismic velocity changes on Kyushu Island during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake.
    Nimiya H; Ikeda T; Tsuji T
    Sci Adv; 2017 Nov; 3(11):e1700813. PubMed ID: 29202026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Engineering aspects of seismic behavior of health-care facilities: lessons from California earthquakes].
    Rutenberg A
    Harefuah; 1995 Mar; 128(6):352-6, 400, 399. PubMed ID: 7750814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Crustal Dynamics and Its Geological Explanation of the Three-Dimensional Co-Seismic Deformation Field for the 2021 Maduo
    Li X; Chen Y; Wang X; Xiong R
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 37112137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SAR and optical images correlation illuminates post-seismic landslide motion after the Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake (Nepal).
    Lacroix P; Gavillon T; Bouchant C; Lavé J; Mugnier JL; Dhungel S; Vernier F
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6266. PubMed ID: 35428776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective time- and frequency-domain techniques for interpreting seismic precursors in groundwater level fluctuations on Jeju Island, Korea.
    Hwang HS; Hamm SY; Cheong JY; Lee SH; Ha K; Lee C; Woo NC; Yun SM; Kim KH
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7866. PubMed ID: 32398830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.