165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37777776)
21. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing CT-based planning with conventional total hip arthroplasty versus robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty.
Fontalis A; Kayani B; Plastow R; Giebaly DE; Tahmassebi J; Haddad IC; Chambers A; Mancino F; Konan S; Haddad FS
Bone Joint J; 2024 Apr; 106-B(4):324-335. PubMed ID: 38555946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Do custom 3D-printed revision acetabular implants provide enough value to justify the additional costs? The health-economic comparison of a new porous 3D-printed hip implant for revision arthroplasty of Paprosky type 3B acetabular defects and its closest alternative.
Tack P; Victor J; Gemmel P; Annemans L
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Feb; 107(1):102600. PubMed ID: 32409268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial.
Takada R; Jinno T; Miyatake K; Hirao M; Yagishita K; Yoshii T; Okawa A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Sep; 105(5):915-922. PubMed ID: 31204181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of 3D Printing Rapid Prototyping Technology with Traditional Radiographs in Evaluating Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective and Consecutive Study.
Zhang JW; Liu XL; Zeng YM; Zhai ZJ; Mao YQ; Yu DG; Wang L; Yan MN; Zhu ZN; Li HW
Orthop Surg; 2021 Aug; 13(6):1773-1780. PubMed ID: 34409750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.
Chiarlone F; Zanirato A; Cavagnaro L; Alessio-Mazzola M; Felli L; Burastero G
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Mar; 140(3):415-424. PubMed ID: 31960168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.
Roessler PP; Jaenisch M; Kuhlmann M; Wacker M; Johannes Wagenhäuser P; Gravius S; Wirtz DC
Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2269-2278. PubMed ID: 30539219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.
Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M
Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. High accuracy of positioning custom triflange acetabular components in tumour and total hip arthroplasty revision surgery.
Broekhuis D; Meurs WMH; Kaptein BL; Karunaratne S; Carey Smith RL; Sommerville S; Boyle R; Nelissen RGHH
Bone Jt Open; 2024 Apr; 5(4):260-268. PubMed ID: 38555947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Accuracy of Acetabular Cup Positioning Using Patient-Specific 3D Orientation Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
McMahon SJ; Christmas MUSI; Pierrepont J; McMahon J; McMahon R
Surg Technol Int; 2020 May; 36():426-431. PubMed ID: 32359167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Standard Versus Custom-Made Acetabular Implants in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Tikhilov RM; Dzhavadov AA; Kovalenko AN; Bilyk SS; Denisov AO; Shubnyakov II
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jan; 37(1):119-125. PubMed ID: 34598861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Trč T; Stastný E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.
Schmolders J; Friedrich MJ; Michel RD; Randau TM; Wimmer MD; Strauss AC; Kohlhof H; Wirtz DC; Gravius S
Int Orthop; 2015 Apr; 39(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 25277762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Redefining the 3D Topography of the Acetabular Safe Zone: A Multivariable Study Evaluating Prosthetic Hip Stability.
Hevesi M; Wyles CC; Rouzrokh P; Erickson BJ; Maradit-Kremers H; Lewallen DG; Taunton MJ; Trousdale RT; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Feb; 104(3):239-245. PubMed ID: 34958643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The validity and reproducibility of cross table radiographs compared with CT scans for the measurement of anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty.
Pankaj A; Mittal A; Chawla A
Bone Joint J; 2017 Aug; 99-B(8):1006-1011. PubMed ID: 28768776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Which one is more affected by navigation-assisted cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: Anteversion or inclination? A retrospective matched-pair cohort study in Asian physique.
Oh KJ; Kim BK; Jo MI; Ahn BM
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018780755. PubMed ID: 29890935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Acetabular defect classification and management : Revision arthroplasty of the acetabular cup based on 3-point fixation.
Ghanem M; Zajonz D; Heyde CE; Roth A
Orthopade; 2020 May; 49(5):432-442. PubMed ID: 32112227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Favorable Results of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Acetabular Impaction Bone Grafting for Large Segmental Bone Defects in Dysplastic Hips.
Iwase T; Morita D; Ito T; Takemoto G; Makida K
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2221-6. PubMed ID: 27133930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Novel Acetabular Cup for Revision THA Improves Hip Center of Rotation: A Radiographic Evaluation.
Khlopas A; Chughtai M; Elmallah RK; Hip-Flores D; Malkani AL; Harwin SF; Mont MA; Ries MD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):315-322. PubMed ID: 29529662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy and practicability of a patient-specific guide using acetabular superolateral rim during THA in Crowe II/III DDH patients: a retrospective study.
Wang C; Xiao H; Yang W; Wang L; Hu Y; Liu H; Zhong D
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Jan; 14(1):19. PubMed ID: 30642333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
