These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37778954)

  • 21. Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Transrectal Ultrasonography Biopsy for Biopsy-Naive Men at Risk for Prostate Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Klotz L; Chin J; Black PC; Finelli A; Anidjar M; Bladou F; Mercado A; Levental M; Ghai S; Chang SD; Milot L; Patel C; Kassam Z; Moore C; Kasivisvanathan V; Loblaw A; Kebabdjian M; Earle CC; Pond GR; Haider MA
    JAMA Oncol; 2021 Apr; 7(4):534-542. PubMed ID: 33538782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer.
    Drost FH; Osses DF; Nieboer D; Steyerberg EW; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 4(4):CD012663. PubMed ID: 31022301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
    Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
    J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Targeted and systematic cognitive freehand-guided transperineal biopsy: is there still a role for systematic biopsy?
    Neale A; Stroman L; Kum F; Jabarkhyl D; Di Benedetto A; Mehan N; Rusere J; Chandra A; Challacombe B; Cathcart P; Dasgupta P; Elhage O; Popert R
    BJU Int; 2020 Aug; 126(2):280-285. PubMed ID: 32320126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Precision-guidance vs Systematic Sampling: Optimizing Biopsy Assessment of Secondary Prostate Cancer Suspicious Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions.
    Rachubinski P; Witt JH; Budäus L; Zinke J; Fangmeyer B; Spieker T; Vetterlein M; Rahbar K; Kachanov M; Leyh-Bannurah SR
    J Urol; 2022 Dec; 208(6):1203-1213. PubMed ID: 36001731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
    Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Prospective Multicenter Comparison Study of Risk-adapted Ultrasound-directed and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Wagensveld IM; Osses DF; Groenendijk PM; Zijta FM; Busstra MB; Rociu E; Barentsz JO; Michiel Sedelaar JP; Arbeel B; Roeleveld T; Geenen R; Koeter I; van der Meer SA; Cappendijk V; Somford R; Klaver S; Van der Lely H; Wolters T; Hellings W; Leter MR; Van der Poel HG; Heijmink SWTPJ; Debruyne F; Immerzeel J; Leijte J; van Roermund J; Miclea R; Planken E; Vis AN; Jan de Jong I; Tijsterman J; Wolterbeek D; Claessen A; Vrijhof E; Nederend J; Van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Remmers S; Schoots IG;
    Eur Urol; 2022 Sep; 82(3):318-326. PubMed ID: 35341658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnostic Performance of
    Light A; Lazic S; Houghton K; Bayne M; Connor MJ; Tam H; Ahmed HU; Shah TT; Barwick TD
    J Nucl Med; 2024 Mar; 65(3):379-385. PubMed ID: 38212074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The SmartTarget Biopsy Trial: A Prospective, Within-person Randomised, Blinded Trial Comparing the Accuracy of Visual-registration and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Image-fusion Targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification.
    Hamid S; Donaldson IA; Hu Y; Rodell R; Villarini B; Bonmati E; Tranter P; Punwani S; Sidhu HS; Willis S; van der Meulen J; Hawkes D; McCartan N; Potyka I; Williams NR; Brew-Graves C; Freeman A; Moore CM; Barratt D; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
    Eur Urol; 2019 May; 75(5):733-740. PubMed ID: 30527787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Highest Grade Group Does Not Drive the Risk of Recurrence when Systematic and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-targeted Biopsies are Discordant: Preliminary Findings Using Radical Prostatectomy Pathology as a Surrogate for MRI-targeted Biopsy Grade.
    Scuderi S; Pellegrino F; Tin A; Beech BB; Gandaglia G; Stabile A; Eastham JA; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Vickers AJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2024 May; 10(3):486-488. PubMed ID: 37739916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate?
    Exterkate L; Wegelin O; Barentsz JO; van der Leest MG; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; van Melick HHE; Somford DM
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 3(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 31239236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy.
    Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.
    Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Ogawa T; Kawakami M; Nakano M; Hashida K; Sato Y; Hasebe T; Uchida T; Tajiri T
    Int J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28222486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evolution of Targeted Prostate Biopsy by Adding Micro-Ultrasound to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pathway.
    Wiemer L; Hollenbach M; Heckmann R; Kittner B; Plage H; Reimann M; Asbach P; Friedersdorff F; Schlomm T; Hofbauer S; Cash H
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1292-1299. PubMed ID: 32654967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
    Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
    Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?
    Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F
    J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multicenter Randomized Trial Assessing MRI and Image-guided Biopsy for Suspected Prostate Cancer: The MULTIPROS Study.
    Wei C; Szewczyk-Bieda M; Bates AS; Donnan PT; Rauchhaus P; Gandy S; Ragupathy SKA; Singh P; Coll K; Serhan J; Wilson J; Nabi G
    Radiology; 2023 Jul; 308(1):e221428. PubMed ID: 37489992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Biopsy Strategies for Changing the Paradigm of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.
    Schoots IG; Padhani AR; Rouvière O; Barentsz JO; Richenberg J
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 31706946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.