115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37778978)
1. [Measurement of Average Glandular Dose Using Multiparameter X-ray Measuring Instrument].
Kobayashi T; Koyama T; Terada M; Negishi T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2023 Nov; 79(11):1266-1273. PubMed ID: 37778978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The measurement of entrance surface dose using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for determining average glandular dose in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurement and simulation study.
Chusin T; Yabsantia S; Matsubara K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 23(1):e13485. PubMed ID: 35041264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Solid-state dosimeters: a new approach for mammography measurements.
Brateman LF; Heintz PH
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):542-57. PubMed ID: 25652475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of single-shot beam quality measurements using state of the art solid-state dosimeters for routine quality assurance applications in mammography.
Bemelmans F; Marshall NW; Dedulle A; Tri Wigati K; Ivanovic S; Binst J; Struelens L; De Hauwere A; Devillers M; Bosmans H
Phys Med; 2021 Aug; 88():242-249. PubMed ID: 34311162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SU-E-I-60: Validation of An Optically Stimulated Luminescent (OSL) Dosimeter for Use in Output Exposure Control Verification of Mammography Imaging Systems.
Ranger R; Butler P; Yahnke C; Valentino D
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part5):3638. PubMed ID: 28517671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the mean glandular dose using LiF:Mg,Ti, LiF:Mg,Cu,P, Li2B4O7:Mn and Li2B4O7:Cu TL detectors in mammography radiation fields.
Fartaria MJ; Reis C; Pereira J; Pereira MF; Cardoso JV; Santos LM; Oliveira C; Holovey V; Pascoal A; Alves JG
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6384-99. PubMed ID: 27499104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of HVL measurements utilizing solid state detectors for radiography and fluoroscopy X-ray systems.
Lin PP; Goode AR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 22(9):339-344. PubMed ID: 34375033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of non-contact semiconductor X-ray analyzer for quality assurance in intraoral radiography: a comparison with ionization chamber dosimeter.
Nouchi S; Yoshida H; Miki Y; Tezuka Y; Ogawa R; Ogura I
Oral Radiol; 2023 Oct; 39(4):766-770. PubMed ID: 37318742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mean glandular dose coefficients (D(g)N) for x-ray spectra used in contemporary breast imaging systems.
Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ; Seibert JA; Boone JM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(18):7179-90. PubMed ID: 26348995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.
Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 12674233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of semiconductor dosimeters with a range of radiation qualities used for mammography: A calibration laboratory study.
Salomon E; Homolka P; Csete I; Toroi P
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1372-1378. PubMed ID: 31889315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 'In vivo' average glandular dose evaluation: one-to-one comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography.
Cavagnetto F; Taccini G; Rosasco R; Bampi R; Calabrese M; Tagliafico A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Nov; 157(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 23734057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Measurement of half-value layer in mammography].
Yagi H; Kitamura R; Saruwatari R; Doi N; Yamane E
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 59(6):729-36. PubMed ID: 12881679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Precision of half-value layer measurement on mammography].
Ishii R; Yoshida A; Ishii M; Fujimoto S; Henmi N
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(12):1533-9. PubMed ID: 22186198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient dose in digital mammography.
Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
Shrestha S; Vedantham S; Karellas A
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients.
Klein R; Aichinger H; Dierker J; Jansen JT; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Zoetelief J
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):651-71. PubMed ID: 9127443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x-ray spectra.
Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Nosratieh A; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2148-2160. PubMed ID: 28303582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
