115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37778978)
21. [A Study on the Uncertainty of the Average Glandular Dose in Quality Control of Mammographic X-ray Units].
Takizawa T; Sekimoto M; Kodama N
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38811193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Monte Carlo derivation of filtered tungsten anode X-ray spectra for dose computation in digital mammography.
Paixão L; Oliveira BB; Viloria C; de Oliveira MA; Teixeira MH; Nogueira Mdo S
Radiol Bras; 2015; 48(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 26811553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography System with Different Anode-Filter Combinations Using MCNP Code.
Gholamkar L; Mowlavi AA; Sadeghi M; Athari M
Iran J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(4):e36484. PubMed ID: 27895876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.
Wu X; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 2006265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Displayed Average Glandular Dose in Mammography].
Kitano M; Tokorodani R; Yamada Y; Muto H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022 Nov; 78(11):1333-1340. PubMed ID: 36104224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Catalog of x-ray spectra of Mo-, Rh-, and W-anode-based x-ray tubes from 10 to 50 kV.
Ketelhut S; Büermann L; Hilgers G
Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33902019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit.
Hemdal B; Herrnsdorf L; Andersson I; Bengtsson G; Heddson B; Olsson M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.
Gennaro G; di Maggio C
Eur Radiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):2559-66. PubMed ID: 16733678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characterization of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor dosimeters for application in clinical mammography.
Benevides LA; Hintenlang DE
Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):514-20. PubMed ID: 16532959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computation of beam quality parameters for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, Rh/Rh, and W/Al target/filter combinations in mammography.
Kharrati H; Zarrad B
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2638-42. PubMed ID: 14596300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A pilot study of half-value layer measurements using a semiconductor dosimeter for intraoral radiography.
Nouchi S; Yoshida H; Miki Y; Tezuka Y; Ogawa R; Ogura I
Imaging Sci Dent; 2023 Sep; 53(3):217-220. PubMed ID: 37799740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Experiment of a Dedicated Lead Slit for X-ray Output Analyzer in X-ray CT Half-value Layer Measurements].
Moriwake R; Takei Y; Kuroda T; Ikenaga H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022; 78(2):152-158. PubMed ID: 35185094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Half-value layer measurement: simple process method using radiochromic film.
Gotanda T; Katsuda T; Gotanda R; Tabuchi A; Yamamoto K; Kuwano T; Yatake H; Kashiyama K; Takeda Y
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2009 Sep; 32(3):150-8. PubMed ID: 19873939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Real-time estimation system for mean glandular dose in mammography.
Matsumoto M; Inoue S; Honda I; Yamamoto S; Ueguchi T; Ogata Y; Johkoh T
Radiat Med; 2003; 21(6):280-4. PubMed ID: 14743903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Measured low-energy x-ray spectra of interest in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
Hernandez-Guzman A; Moreno-Ramírez A; Massillon-Jl G
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Oct; 67(21):. PubMed ID: 36179707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets.
Sechopoulosa I; D'Orsi CJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 9(4):161-171. PubMed ID: 19020492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography.
Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Yaffe M; Alm Carlsson G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
