These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37782154)

  • 1. Comparison of bacterial colonization on absorbable non-coated suture with Triclosan- or Chlorhexidine-coated sutures: a randomized controlled study.
    Chaganti S; Kunthsam V; Velangini SY; Alzahrani KJ; Alzahrani FM; Halawani IF; Alshahrani M; Ashi H; Baeshen HA; Patil S
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Sep; 27(18):8371-8383. PubMed ID: 37782154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of two antibacterial-coated resorbable sutures versus noncoated resorbable sutures in periodontal flap surgery: A clinico-microbiological study.
    Karde PA; Sethi KS; Mahale SA; Mamajiwala AS; Kale AM; Joshi CP
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2019; 23(3):220-225. PubMed ID: 31143002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraoperative handling and wound healing: controlled clinical trial comparing coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture).
    Ford HR; Jones P; Gaines B; Reblock K; Simpkins DL
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2005; 6(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16201941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Microbial Adherence on Antibacterial Suture Materials during Intraoral Wound Healing: A Prospective Comparative Study.
    Kandathil AM; Aslam SA; Abidha R; Cherian MP; Soman S; Sudarsanan M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Aug; 24(8):515-520. PubMed ID: 38193173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of sutures coated with triclosan and chlorhexidine for oral biofilm inhibition potential and antimicrobial activity against periodontal pathogens: An
    Sethi KS; Karde PA; Joshi CP
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(5):535-539. PubMed ID: 27966513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of antibacterial-coated and non-coated suture material in intraoral surgery by isolation of adherent bacteria.
    Pelz K; Tödtmann N; Otten JE
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2015; 22(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 26403133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination?
    Edmiston CE; Seabrook GR; Goheen MP; Krepel CJ; Johnson CP; Lewis BD; Brown KR; Towne JB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 203(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17000391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antimicrobial Activity of Antibacterial Sutures in Oral Surgery: A Scoping Review.
    La Rosa GRM; Scapellato S; Cicciù M; Pedullà E
    Int Dent J; 2024 Aug; 74(4):688-695. PubMed ID: 38429145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical site infections after abdominal closure in colorectal surgery using triclosan-coated absorbable suture (PDS Plus) vs. uncoated sutures (PDS II): a randomized multicenter study.
    Baracs J; Huszár O; Sajjadi SG; Horváth OP
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2011 Dec; 12(6):483-9. PubMed ID: 22142314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Viable adhered Staphylococcus aureus highly reduced on novel antimicrobial sutures using chlorhexidine and octenidine to avoid surgical site infection (SSI).
    Obermeier A; Schneider J; Harrasser N; Tübel J; Mühlhofer H; Pförringer D; Deimling CV; Foehr P; Kiefel B; Krämer C; Stemberger A; Schieker M; Burgkart R; von Eisenhart-Rothe R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190912. PubMed ID: 29315313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing surgical site infections in low-income and middle-income countries (FALCON): a pragmatic, multicentre, stratified, randomised controlled trial.
    NIHR Global Research Health Unit on Global Surgery
    Lancet; 2021 Nov; 398(10312):1687-1699. PubMed ID: 34710362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo antibacterial efficacy of MONOCRYL plus antibacterial suture (Poliglecaprone 25 with triclosan).
    Ming X; Nichols M; Rothenburger S
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2007 Apr; 8(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 17437366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of MONOCRYL plus antibacterial suture (Poliglecaprone 25 with triclosan).
    Ming X; Rothenburger S; Yang D
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2007 Apr; 8(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 17437365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do antibacterial-coated sutures reduce wound infection in head and neck cancer reconstruction?
    Chen SY; Chen TM; Dai NT; Fu JP; Chang SC; Deng SC; Chen SG
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 21296544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of the efficacy of coated Vicryl plus antibacterial suture in an animal model of orthopedic surgery.
    Marco F; Vallez R; Gonzalez P; Ortega L; de la Lama J; Lopez-Duran L
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2007 Jun; 8(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 17635059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of triclosan-coated sutures on the incidence of surgical wound infection after lower limb revascularization surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Turtiainen J; Saimanen EI; Mäkinen KT; Nykänen AI; Venermo MA; Uurto IT; Hakala T
    World J Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(10):2528-34. PubMed ID: 22618956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study of the efficacy of Coated VICRYL Plus Antibacterial suture (coated Polyglactin 910 suture with Triclosan) in two animal models of general surgery.
    Gómez-Alonso A; García-Criado FJ; Parreño-Manchado FC; García-Sánchez JE; García-Sánchez E; Parreño-Manchado A; Zambrano-Cuadrado Y
    J Infect; 2007 Jan; 54(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 16487594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Triclosan coated suture in obstetrical surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study (NCT05330650).
    Mbarki W; Bettaieb H; Souayeh N; Laabidi I; Rouis H; Halouani S; Boufarghine R; Bouyahia M; Bouhmida R; Ouederni M; Ben Amor A; Chermiti A; Laamiri H; Lika A; Chaibi I; Oueslati H; Hsayaoui N; Mbarki C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278939. PubMed ID: 36520813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incisional Surgical Site Infection after Abdominal Fascial Closure with Triclosan-Coated Barbed Suture vs Triclosan-Coated Polydioxanone Loop Suture vs Polydioxanone Loop Suture in Emergent Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Ruiz-Tovar J; Llavero C; Jimenez-Fuertes M; Duran M; Perez-Lopez M; Garcia-Marin A
    J Am Coll Surg; 2020 May; 230(5):766-774. PubMed ID: 32113031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of triclosan-coated sutures on the rate of surgical site infection after hip and knee arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial of 2546 patients.
    Sprowson AP; Jensen C; Parsons N; Partington P; Emmerson K; Carluke I; Asaad S; Pratt R; Muller S; Ahmed I; Reed MR
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Mar; 100-B(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 29589500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.