119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37783090)
1. Continuous non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring in early onset severe preeclampsia.
Ackerman-Banks CM; Bhinder J; Eder M; Heerdt P; Sugeng L; Testani J; Alian A; Lipkind H; Velazquez E; Reddy U; Chou JC
Pregnancy Hypertens; 2023 Dec; 34():27-32. PubMed ID: 37783090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM
Monteith C; McSweeney L; Breatnach CR; Doherty A; Shirren L; Tully EC; Dicker P; Malone FD; El-Khuffash A; Kent E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():116-124. PubMed ID: 28753499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring using bioreactance-based technique in pediatric patients with or without ventricular septal defect during anesthesia: in comparison with echocardiography.
Sun Y; Wu C; Wu JZ; Wang SS; Bai J; Zhu M; Zhang YQ; Zhang MZ
Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Feb; 25(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 25039420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal cardiovascular hemodynamics in normotensive versus preeclamptic pregnancies: a prospective longitudinal study using a noninvasive cardiac system (NICaS™).
Lavie A; Ram M; Lev S; Blecher Y; Amikam U; Shulman Y; Avnon T; Weiner E; Many A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jun; 18(1):229. PubMed ID: 29898711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical validation of bioreactance for the measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy.
Ling HZ; Gallardo-Arozena M; Company-Calabuig AM; Nicolaides KH; Kametas NA
Anaesthesia; 2020 Oct; 75(10):1307-1313. PubMed ID: 32469423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiac output measurements during high-risk Cesarean section using electrical bioreactance or arterial waveform analysis: assessment of agreement.
Gutierrez J; Perry H; Columb M; Bampoe S; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 54(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 30302868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-Invasive Haemodynamic Monitoring in Pregnancy: A Comparative Study Using Ultrasound and Bioreactance.
Vinayagam D; Bowe S; Sheehan E; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2017; 41(4):273-282. PubMed ID: 27705969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography.
Vinayagam D; Patey O; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 26970353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy assessment of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in the hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.
Zhu G; Zhang K; Fu Y; Hu Z
Ann Palliat Med; 2020 Sep; 9(5):3506-3512. PubMed ID: 33065801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor in maternal cardiac disease: comparison of NICOM and transthoracic echocardiogram.
Florio KL; Williams EM; White D; Daming T; Hostetter S; Schrufer-Poland T; Gray R; Schmidt L; Grodzinsky A; Lee J; Rader V; Swearingen K; Nelson L; Patel N; Magalski A; Gosch K; Jones P; Fu Z; Spertus JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Mar; 6(3):101312. PubMed ID: 38342307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock: The NICOM Study.
Rali AS; Buechler T; Van Gotten B; Waters A; Shah Z; Haglund N; Sauer A
J Card Fail; 2020 Feb; 26(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 31751786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of bioreactance and echocardiographic non-invasive cardiac output monitoring and myocardial function assessment in primagravida women.
Doherty A; El-Khuffash A; Monteith C; McSweeney L; Breatnach C; Kent E; Tully E; Malone F; Thornton P
Br J Anaesth; 2017 Apr; 118(4):527-532. PubMed ID: 28403411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in neonates using bioreactance: a comparison with echocardiography.
Weisz DE; Jain A; McNamara PJ; EL-Khuffash A
Neonatology; 2012; 102(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 22508150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation.
Squara P; Denjean D; Estagnasie P; Brusset A; Dib JC; Dubois C
Intensive Care Med; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 17458538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter.
Lamia B; Kim HK; Severyn DA; Pinsky MR
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Feb; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 28188408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-invasive hemodynamic assessment of non-pregnant, healthy pregnant and preeclamptic women using bioreactance. [corrected].
Ohashi Y; Ibrahim H; Furtado L; Kingdom J; Carvalho JC
Rev Bras Anestesiol; 2010; 60(6):603-13, 335-40. PubMed ID: 21146056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noninvasive cardiac output measurement using bioreactance in postoperative pediatric patients.
Vergnaud E; Vidal C; Verchere JM; Taright H; Meyer PG; Carli PA; Orliaguet GA
Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Feb; 25(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 24814690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in preterm infants undergoing patent ductus arteriosus ligation: a comparison with echocardiography.
Weisz DE; Jain A; Ting J; McNamara PJ; El-Khuffash A
Neonatology; 2014; 106(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25278031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring with bioreactance as an alternative to invasive instrumentation for preclinical drug evaluation in beagles.
Heerdt PM; Wagner CL; DeMais M; Savarese JJ
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2011; 64(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 21440649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of maternal characteristics and gestational age on hemodynamic indices: NICOM device-specific reference ranges.
Perry H; Stirrup O; Gutierrez J; Vinayagam D; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 54(5):670-675. PubMed ID: 30548496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
