127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37783603)
1. Comparing fine needle biopsy techniques in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized study.
Delgado-Cortés HM; Jáquez-Quintana JO; Gómez-Macías GS; Jiménez-Castillo RA; Barbosa-Quintana O; Salas-Valdez D; Reyna-Arechiga AI; Cab-Morales VA; Pelaez-Luna MC; Maldonado-Garza HJ
Pancreatology; 2023 Nov; 23(7):836-842. PubMed ID: 37783603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dry suction versus wet suction technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Xu S; Wang J; Guo J; Xie F; Qiao W; Meng Y; Peng P; Hu H; Huang Y; Liu S; Qin M; Yao J; Li Y
Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):805. PubMed ID: 38093381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial.
Crinò SF; Conti Bellocchi MC; Di Mitri R; Inzani F; Rimbaș M; Lisotti A; Manfredi G; Teoh AYB; Mangiavillano B; Sendino O; Bernardoni L; Manfrin E; Scimeca D; Unti E; Carlino A; Voiosu T; Mateescu RB; Fusaroli P; Lega S; Buscarini E; Pergola L; Chan SM; Lamonaca L; Ginès À; Fernández-Esparrach G; Facciorusso A; Larghi A
Endoscopy; 2023 Mar; 55(3):225-234. PubMed ID: 35915956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fine Needle Biopsies of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Tissue Acquisition Technique and Needle Design Do Not Impact Specimen Adequacy.
Mendoza Ladd A; Casner N; Cherukuri SV; Garcia C; Padilla O; Dwivedi A; Hakim N
Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Sep; 67(9):4549-4556. PubMed ID: 34859313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between modified wet suction and dry suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions.
Tong T; Tian L; Deng M; Liu Y; Yang Y; Yin H; Long X; Pan S; Yang Z; Luo W; Nie K; Meng X; Xiao M; Wu X; Zhang C; Wang X
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jun; 36(6):1663-1669. PubMed ID: 33295070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic efficacy of three suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: protocol for a multicenter randomized cross-over clinical trial.
Li SY; Zhou W; Shi L; Ding Z; Yao J; Jiang YP; Gao L; Jiang H; Jin ZD; Wang KX
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Jul; 52(7):734-739. PubMed ID: 32430272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial.
Mangiavillano B; Crinò SF; Facciorusso A; Di Matteo F; Barbera C; Larghi A; Rizzatti G; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Auriemma F; Fabbri C; Binda C; Coluccio C; Marocchi G; Staiano T; Conti Bellocchi MC; Bernardoni L; Eusebi LH; Cirota GG; De Nucci G; Stigliano S; Manes G; Bonanno G; Ofosu A; Lamonaca L; Paduano D; Spatola F; Repici A
Endoscopy; 2023 Feb; 55(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 36044915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy.
Sweeney J; Soong L; Goyal A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31903736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Hamada T; Uchino R; Mizuno S; Miyabayashi K; Yamamoto K; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Hirano K; Tanaka M; Tada M; Fukayama M; Koike K
Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM
Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy.
Li Z; Liu W; Xu X; Li P
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 56(8):668-678. PubMed ID: 35470294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fine Needle Aspiration versus Fine Needle Biopsy of Biliopancreatic Lesions: Are They Really Opposing Techniques or Can They Be Complementary? Our Experience in a Large Cohort of Cases from a Single Institution.
Nicola M; Onorati M; Albertoni MM; Bianchi CL; De Nucci G; Mandelli ED; Nicola L; Di Nuovo F
Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 33099544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge
Siddique DA; Rahal MA; Trevino K; Wu HH; Al-Haddad MA
Anticancer Res; 2020 Oct; 40(10):5845-5851. PubMed ID: 32988914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
