124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37783635)
1. Active surveillance in favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A single-center experience.
Bandelier Q; Bastide C; Charvet AL; Leclercq L; Gondran-Tellier B; Campagna J; Long-Depaquit T; Daniel L; Rossi D; Lechevallier E; Baboudjian M
Fr J Urol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):102537. PubMed ID: 37783635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unified model involving genomics, magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density outperforms individual co-variables at predicting biopsy upgrading in patients on active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.
Beksac AT; Ratnani P; Dovey Z; Parekh S; Falagario U; Roshandel R; Sobotka S; Kewlani D; Davis A; Weil R; Bashorun H; Jambor I; Lewis S; Haines K; Tewari AK
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 Mar; 5(3):e1492. PubMed ID: 34931468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Follow-up of Patients Included in Active Surveillance Protocol. Can PSA Density Discriminate Patients at Different Risk of Reclassification?
Roscigno M; Stabile A; Lughezzani G; Pepe P; Galosi AB; Naselli A; Naspro R; Nicolai M; La Croce G; Aljoulani M; Perugini G; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Balzarini L; Sironi S; Da Pozzo LF
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Dec; 18(6):e698-e704. PubMed ID: 32493676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Expanding inclusion criteria for active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a machine learning approach.
Baboudjian M; Breda A; Roumeguère T; Uleri A; Roche JB; Touzani A; Lacetera V; Beauval JB; Diamand R; Simone G; Windisch O; Benamran D; Fourcade A; Fiard G; Durand-Labrunie C; Roumiguié M; Sanguedolce F; Oderda M; Barret E; Fromont G; Dariane C; Charvet AL; Gondran-Tellier B; Bastide C; Lechevallier E; Palou J; Ruffion A; Van Der Bergh RCN; Peltier A; Ploussard G
World J Urol; 2023 May; 41(5):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 36920491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Serial Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
Chu CE; Cowan JE; Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Fasulo V; de la Calle CM; Shinohara K; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 33483265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Long-Term Risks of Metastases in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Maggi M; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; Lonergan PE; Sciarra A; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 33157570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort.
Tosoian JJ; Mamawala M; Epstein JI; Landis P; Macura KJ; Simopoulos DN; Carter HB; Gorin MA
Eur Urol; 2020 Jun; 77(6):675-682. PubMed ID: 31918957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging facilitates reclassification during active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Fujihara A; Iwata T; Shakir A; Tafuri A; Cacciamani GE; Gill K; Ashrafi A; Ukimura O; Desai M; Duddalwar V; Stern MS; Aron M; Palmer SL; Gill IS; Abreu AL
BJU Int; 2021 Jun; 127(6):712-721. PubMed ID: 33043575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
Jayadevan R; Felker ER; Kwan L; Barsa DE; Zhang H; Sisk AE; Delfin M; Marks LS
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911019. PubMed ID: 31509206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Zhao S; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1216-1221. PubMed ID: 32519915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer.
Bul M; van den Bergh RC; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Vasarainen H; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1672-7. PubMed ID: 22928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.
Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Multivariable Approach Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Avoid a Protocol-based Prostate Biopsy in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer-Data from the International Multicenter Prospective PRIAS Study.
Luiting HB; Remmers S; Boevé ER; Valdagni R; Chiu PK; Semjonow A; Berge V; Tully KH; Rannikko AS; Staerman F; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Dec; 5(6):651-658. PubMed ID: 35437217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Active surveillance of low-grade prostate cancer using the SurACaP Criteria: A multi-institutional series with a median follow-up of 10years.
Leclercq L; Bastide C; Lechevallier E; Walz J; Charvet AL; Gondran-Tellier B; Campagna J; Savoie PH; Long-Depaquit T; Daniel L; Rossi D; Pignot G; Baboudjian M
Fr J Urol; 2024 Mar; 34(2):102571. PubMed ID: 38717459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical utility of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy in patients with lower suspicion lesions on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Lokeshwar SD; Nguyen J; Rahman SN; Khajir G; Ho R; Ghabili K; Leapman MS; Weinreb JC; Sprenkle PC
Urol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):407.e21-407.e27. PubMed ID: 35811206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeat MRI during active surveillance: natural history of prostatic lesions and upgrading rates.
Luzzago S; Piccinelli ML; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Di Trapani E; Cioffi A; Catellani M; Fontana M; Jannello LMI; Botticelli FMG; Marvaso G; Alessi S; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Fusco N; Petralia G; de Cobelli O; Musi G
BJU Int; 2022 Apr; 129(4):524-533. PubMed ID: 34687137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying intermediate-risk candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer.
Savdie R; Aning J; So AI; Black PC; Gleave ME; Goldenberg SL
Urol Oncol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):605.e1-605.e8. PubMed ID: 28736249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active Surveillance for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Metaregression.
Baboudjian M; Breda A; Rajwa P; Gallioli A; Gondran-Tellier B; Sanguedolce F; Verri P; Diana P; Territo A; Bastide C; Spratt DE; Loeb S; Tosoian JJ; Leapman MS; Palou J; Ploussard G
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Dec; 5(6):617-627. PubMed ID: 35934625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utilizing lesion diameter and prostate specific antigen density to decide on magnetic resonance imaging guided confirmatory biopsy of prostate imaging reporting and data system score three lesions in African American prostate cancer patients managed with active surveillance.
Alanee S; Deebajah M; Dabaja A; Peabody J; Menon M
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Apr; 54(4):799-803. PubMed ID: 35138582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
