These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37783843)

  • 1. Single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal versus reusable instruments: a prospective, comparative study of functionality, risk of infection, and costs.
    Oderda M; Asimakopoulos A; Batetta V; Bosio A; Dalmasso E; Morra I; Vercelli E; Gontero P
    World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 37783843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal on hospital costs and work organization: A multicentric evaluation.
    Oderda M; Amato A; de la Rosette J; Doizi S; Estrade V; Falcone M; Grey B; Knudsen B; Olsburgh J; Pietropaolo A; Rukin N; Sedigh O; Saeed A; Somani BK; Gontero P
    Urologia; 2023 Nov; 90(4):670-677. PubMed ID: 37154464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The new grasper-integrated single use flexible cystoscope for double J stent removal: evaluation of image quality, flow and flexibility.
    Talso M; Emiliani E; Baghdadi M; Orosa A; Servian P; Barreiro A; Proietti S; Traxer O
    World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1277-1283. PubMed ID: 27987031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-Use Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope for Stent Removal: A Micro-Costing Analysis-Based Comparison.
    Beebe SC; Jenkins LC; Posid T; Knudsen BE; Sourial MW
    J Endourol; 2020 Aug; 34(8):816-820. PubMed ID: 32600072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris
    Jahrreiss V; Sarrot P; Davis NF; Somani B
    J Endourol; 2024 Apr; 38(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 38185843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of the novel, innovative, single-use grasper integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal: a systematic review.
    Adam A; Lawrentschuk N; Bhattu AS; Nagdee J
    ANZ J Surg; 2021 Dec; 91(12):2599-2605. PubMed ID: 33991161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-Use Versus Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal: A Comparative Study of Perceived Pain and Procedure Times.
    Panach-Navarrete J; Lloret-Durà MA; Sánchez-Gimeno S; Murcia-Díez E; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM
    Arch Esp Urol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 36914421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disposable grasper-integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal in transplanted patients; focus on feasibility, safety, and patient experience. Results and micro-cost analysis from a tertiary referral center.
    Bosio A; Alessandria E; Gozzo C; Vercelli E; Micai L; Bertello G; Pasquale G; Sedigh O; Oderda M; Biancone L; Gontero P
    Clin Transplant; 2024 May; 38(5):e15321. PubMed ID: 38716774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal.
    Oderda M; Antolini J; Falcone M; Lacquaniti S; Fasolis G
    Urologia; 2020 Feb; 87(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 31282294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible cystoscopy for ureteral stent removal without antimicrobial prophylaxis. A prospective observational study.
    Olivero A; Riccardi N; Ndrevataj D; Balzarini F; Cerasuolo M; Bottino P; Borghesi M; Dodi F; Terrone C
    Urologia; 2021 May; 88(2):130-134. PubMed ID: 33325327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A micro-costing analysis of outpatient flexible cystoscopy: implications for adoption of single-use flexible cystoscopes.
    Su ZT; Huang MM; Matlaga BR; Hutfless S; Koo K
    World J Urol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):4275-4281. PubMed ID: 34019137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible cystoscope dedicated to double-J stent removal (Isiris™): a European prospective multicenter study.
    Doizi S; Kamphuis G; Giusti G; Palmero JL; Patterson JM; Proietti S; Straub M; de la Rosette J; Traxer O
    World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 27988848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of ureteric stent removal procedures using reusable and single-use flexible cystoscopes following ureteroscopy and lasertripsy: a micro cost analysis.
    Pietropaolo A; Hughes T; Tear L; Somani BK
    Cent European J Urol; 2020; 73(3):342-348. PubMed ID: 33133663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost and Environmental Impact of Disposable Flexible Cystoscopes Compared to Reusable Devices.
    Boucheron T; Lechevallier E; Gondran-Tellier B; Michel F; Bastide C; Martin N; Baboudjian M
    J Endourol; 2022 Oct; 36(10):1317-1321. PubMed ID: 35703325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective Randomized Trial of Single-Use
    Johnson BA; Raman JD; Best SL; Lotan Y
    J Endourol; 2023 Oct; 37(10):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 37565290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reusable vs. single-use cystoscope for removal of double-j stent: a prospective randomized comparison and cost analysis.
    Alkhamees M; Alothman A; Alzughaibi M; AlAsker A; Ghazwani Y; Masuadi E; Alshohayeb I; Hamri SB
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Jun; 26(12):4268-4273. PubMed ID: 35776026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disposable Cystoscopes Do Not Decrease Post Renal Transplant Stent Removal Symptomatic Infection Rates.
    Qosja N; Geldmaker LE; Tiwari V; Fuqua TR; Baird BA; Haehn DA; Ball CT; Wadei HM; Thiel DD
    Urology; 2024 Oct; 192():1-4. PubMed ID: 38908562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cystoscopes: A Path to Greener Urological Procedures.
    Baboudjian M; Pradere B; Martin N; Gondran-Tellier B; Angerri O; Boucheron T; Bastide C; Emiliani E; Misrai V; Breda A; Lechevallier E
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):681-687. PubMed ID: 36543725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conversion to Disposable Cystoscopes Decreased Post-procedure Encounters and Infections Compared to Reusable Cystoscopes.
    Geldmaker LE; Baird BA; Lyon TD; Regele EJ; Wajswol EJ; Pathak RA; Petrou SP; Haehn DA; Gajarawala NM; Ball CT; Broderick GA; Thiel DD
    Urol Pract; 2023 Jul; 10(4):312-317. PubMed ID: 37228224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Utility of a Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope Compared with a Standard Reusable Device: A Randomized Noninferiority Study.
    Holmes A; O'Kane D; Wombwell A; Grills R
    J Endourol; 2023 Jan; 37(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 36128833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.