134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37786915)
1. A comparative evaluation of three consecutive artificial intelligence algorithms released by Techcyte for identification of blasts and white blood cells in abnormal peripheral blood films.
Lincz LF; Makhija K; Attalla K; Scorgie FE; Enjeti AK; Prasad R
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):92-98. PubMed ID: 37786915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. White blood cell evaluation in haematological malignancies using a web-based digital microscopy platform.
Makhija K; Lincz LF; Attalla K; Scorgie FE; Enjeti AK; Prasad R
Int J Lab Hematol; 2021 Dec; 43(6):1379-1387. PubMed ID: 34275203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Framework for Radiation Oncology Department-wide Evaluation and Implementation of Commercial Artificial Intelligence Autocontouring.
Maes D; Gates EDH; Meyer J; Kang J; Nguyen BT; Lavilla M; Melancon D; Weg ES; Tseng YD; Lim A; Bowen SR
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2024; 14(2):e150-e158. PubMed ID: 37935308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia-Related Anatomical Isthmuses in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: What Is the Role of the 12-Lead Ventricular Tachycardia Electrocardiogram.
Brouwer C; Kapel GFL; Jongbloed MRM; Schalij MJ; de Riva Silva M; Zeppenfeld K
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2018 Oct; 4(10):1308-1318. PubMed ID: 30336877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial intelligence of digital morphology analyzers improves the efficiency of manual leukocyte differentiation of peripheral blood.
Xing Y; Liu X; Dai J; Ge X; Wang Q; Hu Z; Wu Z; Zeng X; Xu D; Qu C
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Mar; 23(1):50. PubMed ID: 36991420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Serum Exoglycosidases in Children and Adolescents With Harmful Alcohol Use.
Waszkiewicz N; Olański W; Chojnowska S; Kołakowska U; Plewa K; Mielech W; Bagniuk-Plewa A; Wasilewska A; Szulc A; Szajda SD; Zwierz K
J Addict Med; 2018; 12(4):329-335. PubMed ID: 29570478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial intelligence and the blood film: Performance of the MC-80 digital morphology analyzer in samples with neoplastic and reactive cell types.
Zini G; Mancini F; Rossi E; Landucci S; d'Onofrio G
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Dec; 45(6):881-889. PubMed ID: 37641457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a Novel Flow Cytometry-Based System for White Blood Cell Differential Counts: 10-color LeukoDiff.
Park D; Chang J; Kahng J; Park H; Jo I; Kim Y; Han K
Ann Lab Med; 2019 Mar; 39(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30430776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Fully Automated Artificial Intelligence System to Assist Pathologists' Diagnosis to Predict Histologically High-grade Urothelial Carcinoma from Digitized Urine Cytology Slides Using Deep Learning.
Tsuji K; Kaneko M; Harada Y; Fujihara A; Ueno K; Nakanishi M; Konishi E; Takamatsu T; Horiguchi G; Teramukai S; Ito-Ihara T; Ukimura O
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Apr; 7(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 38065702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accurate white blood cell differential by Alinity hq: A comparison with flow cytometry and manual differential.
Gambell P; Rowley G; Pham TAT; Dang TL; Mulumba H; Smith L; Lakos G
Int J Lab Hematol; 2022 Apr; 44(2):288-295. PubMed ID: 34806835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of the new MC-80 automated digital cell morphology analyser in detection of normal and abnormal blood cells: Comparison with the CellaVision DM9600.
Merino A; Laguna J; Rodríguez-García M; Julian J; Casanova A; Molina A
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 37746889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance comparison of two automated digital morphology analyzers for leukocyte differential in patients with malignant hematological diseases: Mindray MC-80 and Sysmex DI-60.
Ye X; Fang L; Chen Y; Tong J; Ning X; Feng L; Xu Y; Yang D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Jun; 46(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 38212663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the CELL-DYN 3000 differential.
Cornbleet PJ; Myrick D; Judkins S; Levy R
Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Dec; 98(6):603-14. PubMed ID: 1462958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphogo: An Automatic Bone Marrow Cell Classification System on Digital Images Analyzed by Artificial Intelligence.
Fu X; Fu M; Li Q; Peng X; Lu J; Fang F; Chen M
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(6):588-596. PubMed ID: 32721953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF.
VerMilyea M; Hall JMM; Diakiw SM; Johnston A; Nguyen T; Perugini D; Miller A; Picou A; Murphy AP; Perugini M
Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):770-784. PubMed ID: 32240301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Chest Radiograph Interpretations by Artificial Intelligence Algorithm vs Radiology Residents.
Wu JT; Wong KCL; Gur Y; Ansari N; Karargyris A; Sharma A; Morris M; Saboury B; Ahmad H; Boyko O; Syed A; Jadhav A; Wang H; Pillai A; Kashyap S; Moradi M; Syeda-Mahmood T
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2022779. PubMed ID: 33034642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80.
Khongjaroensakun N; Chaothai N; Chamchomdao L; Suriyachand K; Paisooksantivatana K
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Oct; 45(5):691-699. PubMed ID: 37338111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of an artificial intelligence algorithm for assisting the Paris System in reporting urinary cytology: A pilot study.
Ou YC; Tsao TY; Chang MC; Lin YS; Yang WL; Hang JF; Li CB; Lee CM; Yeh CH; Liu TJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Nov; 130(11):872-880. PubMed ID: 35727052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flow cytometric white blood cell differential using CytoDiff is excellent for counting blasts.
Kahng J; Kim Y; Kim M; Oh EJ; Park YJ; Han K
Ann Lab Med; 2015 Jan; 35(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 25553277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
