BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37787697)

  • 1. Enhanced suppression of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral stimulation in Parkinson's disease.
    Moleti A; Minniti T; Viziano A; Stefani A; Cerroni R; Garasto E; Pierantozzi M; Sisto R
    JASA Express Lett; 2023 Oct; 3(10):. PubMed ID: 37787697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions declines with age: a comparison of findings in CBA mice with human listeners.
    Jacobson M; Kim S; Romney J; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Oct; 113(10):1707-13. PubMed ID: 14520094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does hyperandrogenism affect the otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear reflex in female adults?
    Eren E; Harman E; Arslanoğlu S; Önal K; Katlmiş H
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jul; 34(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 23770686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Jun; 60(6):438-445. PubMed ID: 33084414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contralateral suppression of linear and nonlinear transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates at risk for hearing loss.
    Durante AS; Carvallo RM
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 17585930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children.
    Ugur AK; Kemaloglu YK; Ugur MB; Gunduz B; Saridogan C; Yesilkaya E; Bideci A; Cinaz P; Goksu N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 19150138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efferent Modulation of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Fine Structure.
    Zhao W; Dewey JB; Boothalingam S; Dhar S
    Front Syst Neurosci; 2015; 9():168. PubMed ID: 26696843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
    Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of contralateral masking on the latency of otoacoustic emissions elicited by acoustic distortion products.
    Silva A; Ysunza A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1998 Jul; 44(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 9725528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Could the Use of Acoustic Reflexes Prior to Administering Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) Affect the Results of DPOAEs?
    Garrette R; Jones AL; Wilson MW
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):349-353. PubMed ID: 29800116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109915. PubMed ID: 32028191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in neonates.
    Durante AS; Carvalho RM
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Jun; 41(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 12154810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wavelet analysis demonstrates no abnormality in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in tinnitus patients.
    Geven LI; Wit HP; de Kleine E; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 286(1-2):30-40. PubMed ID: 22387429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with cerebello-pontine angle tumor.
    Ferguson MA; O'Donoghue GM; Owen V
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 11409853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with phonological disorder.
    Yılmaz Ş; Taş M; Bulut E
    Balkan Med J; 2021 Mar; 38(2):127-132. PubMed ID: 33283490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Müller J; Janssen T; Zenner HP
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transient otoacoustic emissions in the detection of olivocochlear bundle maturation.
    Gkoritsa E; Tsakanikos M; Korres S; Dellagrammaticas H; Apostolopoulos N; Ferekidis E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 70(4):671-6. PubMed ID: 16198429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study on suppression of otoacoustic emissions: lateral domain.
    Oliveira JR; Fernandes CF; Costa Filho OA
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(5):547-54. PubMed ID: 22030959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.