These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37788011)

  • 1. Cochlear Implant Users can Effectively Combine Place and Timing Cues for Pitch Perception.
    Goldsworthy RL; Bissmeyer SRS
    Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1410-1422. PubMed ID: 37788011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Place and Temporal Cues in Cochlear Implant Pitch and Melody Perception.
    Swanson BA; Marimuthu VMR; Mannell RH
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1266. PubMed ID: 31849583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reverberation Degrades Pitch Perception but Not Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Xu L; Luo J; Xie D; Chao X; Wang R; Zahorik P; Luo X
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1139-1150. PubMed ID: 34799495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cantonese Tone Perception for Children Who Use a Hearing Aid and a Cochlear Implant in Opposite Ears.
    Mok M; Holt CM; Lee KYS; Dowell RC; Vogel AP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e359-e368. PubMed ID: 28678079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining Place and Rate of Stimulation Improves Frequency Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Bissmeyer SRS; Goldsworthy RL
    Hear Res; 2022 Oct; 424():108583. PubMed ID: 35930901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
    Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch.
    Cariani PA; Delgutte B
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 76(3):1717-34. PubMed ID: 8890287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Tao D; Deng R; Jiang Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Chen B
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 25099401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contribution of bimodal hearing to lexical tone normalization in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Chang YP; Lin CY; Chang RY
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():1-8. PubMed ID: 24576834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear implant melody recognition as a function of melody frequency range, harmonicity, and number of electrodes.
    Singh S; Kong YY; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 19194298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience.
    Reiss LA; Ito RA; Eggleston JL; Liao S; Becker JJ; Lakin CE; Warren FM; McMenomey SO
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e23-34. PubMed ID: 25319401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Goldsworthy RL; Bissmeyer SRS; Camarena A
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):137-150. PubMed ID: 34981263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies.
    Donaldson GS; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1645-58. PubMed ID: 10738818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Place-Pitch Interval Perception With a Cochlear Implant.
    Stupak N; Todd AE; Landsberger DM
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):301-312. PubMed ID: 33606415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatiotemporal representation of the pitch of harmonic complex tones in the auditory nerve.
    Cedolin L; Delgutte B
    J Neurosci; 2010 Sep; 30(38):12712-24. PubMed ID: 20861376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sustainable Benefits of High Variability Phonetic Training in Mandarin-speaking Kindergarteners With Cochlear Implants: Evidence From Categorical Perception of Lexical Tones.
    Zhang H; Ma W; Ding H; Zhang Y
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):990-1006. PubMed ID: 36806578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.