196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37788233)
1. Inferred Attractiveness: A generalized mechanism for sexual selection that can maintain variation in traits and preferences over time.
DuVal EH; Fitzpatrick CL; Hobson EA; Servedio MR
PLoS Biol; 2023 Oct; 21(10):e3002269. PubMed ID: 37788233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
Jennions MD; Petrie M
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Veiled preferences and cryptic female choice could underlie the origin of novel sexual traits.
Moehring AJ; Boughman JW
Biol Lett; 2019 Feb; 15(2):20180878. PubMed ID: 30958124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Remodeling male coercion and the evolution of sexual autonomy by mate choice.
Snow SS; Prum RO
Evolution; 2023 Jun; 77(7):1564-1577. PubMed ID: 37260260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin.
Rosenthal GG; Ryan MJ
Science; 2022 Jan; 375(6578):eabi6308. PubMed ID: 35050648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glucocorticoids, male sexual signals, and mate choice by females: Implications for sexual selection.
Leary CJ; Baugh AT
Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2020 Mar; 288():113354. PubMed ID: 31830474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
Bonduriansky R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mate Sampling Behavior Determines the Density Dependence of Sexual Selection.
Watts JC; Hebets EA; Tenhumberg B
Am Nat; 2022 Oct; 200(4):467-485. PubMed ID: 36150191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct fitness benefits explain mate preference, but not choice, for similarity in heterozygosity levels.
Zandberg L; Gort G; van Oers K; Hinde CA
Ecol Lett; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1306-1314. PubMed ID: 28868784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Within-population variation in female mating preference affects the opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, but things are not as simple as expected.
Millan CH; Machado G; Muniz DG
J Evol Biol; 2020 Nov; 33(11):1579-1592. PubMed ID: 32871625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Female preference for rare males is maintained by indirect selection in Trinidadian guppies.
Potter T; Arendt J; Bassar RD; Watson B; Bentzen P; Travis J; Reznick DN
Science; 2023 Apr; 380(6642):309-312. PubMed ID: 37079663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interplay between male quality and male-female compatibility across episodes of sexual selection.
Mahdjoub H; Khelifa R; Roy J; Sbilordo SH; Zeender V; Perdigón Ferreira J; Gourgoulianni N; Lüpold S
Sci Adv; 2023 Sep; 9(39):eadf5559. PubMed ID: 37774022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
Höbel G
J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The better, the choosier: A meta-analysis on interindividual variation of male mate choice.
Pollo P; Nakagawa S; Kasumovic MM
Ecol Lett; 2022 May; 25(5):1305-1322. PubMed ID: 35259282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct selection on male attractiveness and female preference fails to produce a response.
Hall M; Lindholm AK; Brooks R
BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Jan; 4():1. PubMed ID: 14720309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
