These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37788233)

  • 21. Female mating preferences and offspring survival: testing hypotheses on the genetic basis of mate choice in a wild lekking bird.
    Sardell RJ; Kempenaers B; Duval EH
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Feb; 23(4):933-46. PubMed ID: 24383885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mate choice and the operational sex ratio: an experimental test with robotic crabs.
    Hayes CL; Callander S; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD; Backwell PR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1455-61. PubMed ID: 27087241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias.
    Henshaw JM; Fromhage L; Jones AG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(33):e2206262119. PubMed ID: 35939704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genetic variation and covariation in male attractiveness and female mating preferences in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ratterman NL; Rosenthal GG; Carney GE; Jones AG
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Jan; 4(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 24212081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Non-random mating and information theory.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2018 Mar; 120():103-113. PubMed ID: 29391186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Imprinting sets the stage for speciation.
    Yang Y; Servedio MR; Richards-Zawacki CL
    Nature; 2019 Oct; 574(7776):99-102. PubMed ID: 31578486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.
    Calabrese GM; Pfennig KS
    Biol Lett; 2022 Nov; 18(11):20220310. PubMed ID: 36382373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Are high-quality mates always attractive?: State-dependent mate preferences in birds and humans.
    Riebel K; Holveck MJ; Verhulst S; Fawcett TW
    Commun Integr Biol; 2010 May; 3(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 20714411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters.
    Heisler IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contemporary sexual selection does not explain variation in male display traits among populations.
    Watts JC; Flynn A; Tenhumberg B; Hebets EA
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1927-1940. PubMed ID: 31343745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of sexual selection on trait divergence in a peripheral population with gene flow.
    Servedio MR; Bürger R
    Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2648-61. PubMed ID: 26332694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. You're Just My Type: Mate Choice and Behavioral Types.
    Munson AA; Jones C; Schraft H; Sih A
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2020 Sep; 35(9):823-833. PubMed ID: 32451175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process.
    Bailey NW; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2674-84. PubMed ID: 22946795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. It's Not about Him: Mismeasuring 'Good Genes' in Sexual Selection.
    Achorn AM; Rosenthal GG
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2020 Mar; 35(3):206-219. PubMed ID: 31858995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: a non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection.
    Swaddle JP; Cathey MG; Correll M; Hodkinson BP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 May; 272(1567):1053-8. PubMed ID: 16024364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Female brain size affects the assessment of male attractiveness during mate choice.
    Corral-López A; Bloch NI; Kotrschal A; van der Bijl W; Buechel SD; Mank JE; Kolm N
    Sci Adv; 2017 Mar; 3(3):e1601990. PubMed ID: 28345039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.